Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
Ranked by how many works are waiting on verification, which is the queue a nodal authority actually has to clear. Open a district to see the agencies behind those works.
| # | District | Works | Completed | Agencies | Sanctioned | To verify | Flagged value | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NAGAON 2 high risk | 181 | 20 | 1 | ₹6.56 Cr | 159 | ₹5.85 Cr | 42.7 |
| 2 | CHIRANG 13 high risk | 137 | 1 | 1 | ₹16.19 Cr | 117 | ₹14.45 Cr | 54.8 |
| 3 | JORHAT 1 high risk | 150 | 44 | 1 | ₹8.34 Cr | 97 | ₹6.31 Cr | 39.9 |
| 4 | DIBRUGARH | 94 | 2 | 1 | ₹6.80 Cr | 91 | ₹6.63 Cr | 46.8 |
| 5 | SIVASAGAR 29 high risk | 187 | 34 | 1 | ₹9.82 Cr | 84 | ₹6.25 Cr | 41.1 |
| 6 | BARPETA 2 high risk | 197 | 100 | 1 | ₹10.91 Cr | 68 | ₹4.42 Cr | 29.2 |
| 7 | LAKHIMPUR | 79 | 14 | 1 | ₹3.33 Cr | 63 | ₹2.69 Cr | 42.1 |
| 8 | TINSUKIA 1 high risk | 69 | 9 | 1 | ₹4.70 Cr | 60 | ₹4.00 Cr | 44.8 |
| 9 | BAKSA 1 high risk | 45 | 0 | 1 | ₹5.18 Cr | 45 | ₹5.18 Cr | 53.0 |
| 10 | SONITPUR 1 high risk | 71 | 37 | 1 | ₹4.52 Cr | 39 | ₹2.95 Cr | 36.5 |
| 11 | CHARAIDEO 1 high risk | 52 | 13 | 1 | ₹3.16 Cr | 37 | ₹2.50 Cr | 44.8 |
| 12 | CACHAR | 147 | 102 | 1 | ₹9.44 Cr | 36 | ₹4.48 Cr | 22.8 |
| 13 | MARIGAON | 64 | 28 | 1 | ₹2.09 Cr | 36 | ₹1.23 Cr | 29.2 |
| 14 | SRIBHUMI | 49 | 11 | 1 | ₹6.85 Cr | 36 | ₹5.65 Cr | 46.0 |
| 15 | KAMRUP METRO 3 high risk | 47 | 1 | 1 | ₹10.19 Cr | 34 | ₹7.71 Cr | 49.3 |
| 16 | BISWANATH | 49 | 22 | 1 | ₹3.17 Cr | 31 | ₹2.12 Cr | 37.6 |
| 17 | WEST KARBI ANGLONG | 16 | 0 | 1 | ₹2.05 Cr | 16 | ₹2.05 Cr | 51.8 |
| 18 | GOLAGHAT 1 high risk | 109 | 38 | 1 | ₹3.49 Cr | 15 | ₹1.36 Cr | 30.3 |
| 19 | HAILAKANDI | 17 | 15 | 1 | ₹2.65 Cr | 13 | ₹2.19 Cr | 46.4 |
| 20 | SOUTH SALMARA MANCACHAR | 11 | 0 | 1 | ₹57.62 L | 11 | ₹57.62 L | 46.1 |
| 21 | NALBARI 2 high risk | 27 | 10 | 1 | ₹2.92 Cr | 9 | ₹2.03 Cr | 33.3 |
| 22 | KAMRUP 1 high risk | 61 | 16 | 1 | ₹2.93 Cr | 7 | ₹80.00 L | 33.1 |
| 23 | DHEMAJI 1 high risk | 35 | 24 | 1 | ₹2.57 Cr | 7 | ₹1.13 Cr | 24.0 |
| 24 | BAJALI | 7 | 0 | 1 | ₹38.00 L | 7 | ₹38.00 L | 49.0 |
| 25 | UDALGURI 2 high risk | 122 | 33 | 1 | ₹3.43 Cr | 5 | ₹42.00 L | 31.0 |
| 26 | DARRANG | 99 | 53 | 1 | ₹2.71 Cr | 5 | ₹24.50 L | 23.1 |
| 27 | BONGAIGAON | 42 | 32 | 1 | ₹2.56 Cr | 5 | ₹1.02 Cr | 16.6 |
| 28 | DHUBRI 1 high risk | 57 | 38 | 1 | ₹3.07 Cr | 4 | ₹57.75 L | 21.4 |
| 29 | KOKRAJHAR | 15 | 10 | 1 | ₹1.63 Cr | 4 | ₹55.00 L | 34.8 |
| 30 | TAMULPUR 1 high risk | 8 | 0 | 1 | ₹49.00 L | 4 | ₹34.00 L | 42.3 |
| 31 | KARBI ANGLONG | 22 | 19 | 1 | ₹7.55 Cr | 3 | ₹55.00 L | 26.2 |
| 32 | MAJULI 1 high risk | 2 | 1 | 1 | ₹40.00 L | 2 | ₹40.00 L | 63.2 |
| 33 | GOALPARA | 44 | 24 | 1 | ₹4.86 Cr | 1 | ₹20.00 L | 20.3 |
| 34 | MATHURA | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹25.00 L | 1 | ₹25.00 L | 45.6 |
| 35 | DIMA HASAO | 1 | 1 | 1 | ₹19.81 L | 0 | ₹0 | 25.6 |
Ordered by the share of allocation actually paid to vendors, lowest first — the members whose funds are moving slowest are the ones a nodal authority chases. “Committed” is money attached to a work but not yet paid; the portal publishes that figure under the name “utilisation”, which is why the two columns differ.
| Member | Allocated | Paid out | Committed | Never committed | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terash Gowalla Sitting Rajya Sabha | ₹4.90 Cr | 0.0% | 0.0% | ₹4.90 Cr | 0 |
| Pramod Boro Sitting Rajya Sabha · 10 works | ₹4.90 Cr | 0.0% | 23.5% | ₹3.75 Cr | 4 |
| Jogen Mohan Sitting Rajya Sabha · 22 works | ₹4.90 Cr | 3.1% | 62.0% | ₹1.86 Cr | 16 |
| Birendra Prasad Baishya Sitting Rajya Sabha · 45 works | ₹9.80 Cr | 28.4% | 79.1% | ₹2.05 Cr | 21 |
| Kanad Purkayastha Sitting Rajya Sabha · 50 works | ₹9.80 Cr | 28.6% | 66.3% | ₹3.30 Cr | 30 |
| Pabitra Margherita Sitting Rajya Sabha · 210 works | ₹22.06 Cr | 28.9% | 77.1% | ₹5.05 Cr | 130 |
| Rwngwra Narzary Sitting Rajya Sabha · 166 works | ₹22.06 Cr | 54.3% | 92.4% | ₹1.67 Cr | 127 |
| Rameswar Teli DIBRUGARH · 132 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 68.4% | 89.3% | ₹1.05 Cr | 127 |
| Gaurav Gogoi Kaziranga · 213 works | ₹4.91 Cr | 73.9% | 99.9% | ₹63,957.11 | 112 |
| Dilip Saikia Darrang-Udalguri · 272 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 75.5% | 93.9% | ₹44.64 L | 8 |
| Pradyut Bordoloi NOWGONG · 137 works | ₹4.91 Cr | 80.7% | 95.6% | ₹21.66 L | 95 |
| Pradan Baruah LAKHIMPUR · 117 works | ₹5.44 Cr | 84.8% | 94.3% | ₹30.98 L | 71 |
| Abdul Khaleque BARPETA · 217 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 85.2% | 98.1% | ₹18.64 L | 67 |
| Queen Oja GUWAHATI · 25 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 86.3% | 91.1% | ₹65.65 L | 20 |
| Badruddin Ajmal DHUBRI · 93 works | ₹4.91 Cr | 87.9% | 98.7% | ₹6.52 L | 13 |
| Naba (Hira) Kumar Sarania KOKRAJHAR · 75 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 88.6% | 98.6% | ₹10.15 L | 55 |
| Topon Kumar Gogoi JORHAT · 186 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 90.8% | 99.2% | ₹7.74 L | 100 |
| Horen Sing Bey Diphu · 39 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 93.2% | 99.9% | ₹63,957.11 | 19 |
| Pallab Lochan Das Sonitpur · 128 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 93.9% | 99.2% | ₹5.69 L | 78 |
| Kripanath Mallah KARIMGANJ · 70 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 98.7% | 99.9% | ₹1.33 L | 57 |
| Rajdeep Roy SILCHAR · 107 works | ₹4.78 Cr | 99.5% | 99.9% | ₹58,326.67 | 2 |
Sector is read from each work’s own description, because the portal’s category column says “Normal/Others” on almost every row.
| Sector | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Community Buildings | 652 | ₹37.32 Cr | 322 |
| Religious & Cultural | 477 | ₹23.65 Cr | 225 |
| Roads & Paving | 463 | ₹39.49 Cr | 229 |
| Education | 379 | ₹28.09 Cr | 181 |
| Boundary & Protection | 157 | ₹7.50 Cr | 72 |
| Street Lighting | 46 | ₹6.86 Cr | 42 |
| Drainage & Sanitation | 35 | ₹2.31 Cr | 18 |
| Water | 30 | ₹4.15 Cr | 18 |
| Sports | 27 | ₹1.99 Cr | 18 |
| Health | 27 | ₹2.77 Cr | 15 |
Patterns across a whole agency or member, not a judgement on any one work — which is why none of these change a work’s score.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
The whole population fails the textbook test — the median agency scores 6.2 where Nigrini calls 1.5 nonconformant — because MPLADS amounts are capped, rounded and repeated by design. This ranks agencies against each other, not against the law. It is the weakest signal here and is never evidence on its own.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
Round figures are normal and similar works legitimately cost the same. One figure covering nearly every work is what this looks for, and it means the costing is worth seeing, not that it is wrong.
Round figures are normal and similar works legitimately cost the same. One figure covering nearly every work is what this looks for, and it means the costing is worth seeing, not that it is wrong.
Round figures are normal and similar works legitimately cost the same. One figure covering nearly every work is what this looks for, and it means the costing is worth seeing, not that it is wrong.
The ten works least like their peers. A score is a reason to look, never a finding of wrongdoing.
| Work | District | Agency | Sanctioned | Score | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Construction of Indoor Sports Stadium at Bengali Boy’s Schoo ₹5,000,000 against a ₹300,000 median for Education works in NAGAON (1567% above, 49 peer works) | NAGAON | NAGAON(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER NOWGONG_IDA) | ₹50.00 L | 81.3 | HIGH |
| Construction of Guest House at Mahapurush Srimanta Sankardev ₹5,000,000 against a ₹300,000 median for Community Buildings works in NAGAON (1567% above, 101 peer works) | NAGAON | NAGAON(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER NOWGONG_IDA) | ₹50.00 L | 81.3 | HIGH |
| Construction of Stage at Lashit Yovak Sangha at 2 No. Kohalg ₹2,000,000 against a ₹200,000 median for Religious & Cultural works in MAJULI (900% above, 13 peer works) | MAJULI | MAJULI(District Commissioner, Majuli) | ₹20.00 L | 81.1 | HIGH |
| Construction of Assam Type Guest House at Rangagora Amlokhi ₹2,500,000 against a ₹200,000 median for Community Buildings works in CHARAIDEO (1150% above, 26 peer works) | CHARAIDEO | CHARAIDEO(Deputy Commissioner Charaideo_IDA) | ₹25.00 L | 80.8 | HIGH |
| Construction of Gorkha Sanskritik Kala Kristi Knedra at Free ₹5,000,000 against a ₹500,000 median for Religious & Cultural works in TINSUKIA (900% above, 26 peer works) | TINSUKIA | TINSUKIA(DC Tinsukia) | ₹50.00 L | 80.6 | HIGH |
| Construction of Gully control at No 2 Polashguri village und ₹2,000,000 against a ₹1,000,000 median for Boundary & Protection works in CHIRANG (100% above, 25 peer works) | CHIRANG | CHIRANG(Deputy Commissioner Chirang_IDA) | ₹20.00 L | 79.7 | HIGH |
| Construction of New Nilibary Community Hall at New Nilibary ₹2,000,000 against a ₹1,000,000 median for Community Buildings works in CHIRANG (100% above, 52 peer works) | CHIRANG | CHIRANG(Deputy Commissioner Chirang_IDA) | ₹20.00 L | 79.7 | HIGH |
| Construction of road at Shiv nagar, Dangtal Bazar under Dang ₹2,000,000 against a ₹800,000 median for Roads & Paving works in CHIRANG (150% above, 144 peer works) | CHIRANG | CHIRANG(Deputy Commissioner Chirang_IDA) | ₹20.00 L | 79.7 | HIGH |
| construction of Bridge at Dawkhanwgwr-2 over Fwilamari dong ₹2,200,000 against a ₹800,000 median for Roads & Paving works in CHIRANG (175% above, 144 peer works) | CHIRANG | CHIRANG(Deputy Commissioner Chirang_IDA) | ₹22.00 L | 79.7 | HIGH |
| Construction of Crematorium or structure and approach road o ₹2,000,000 against a ₹800,000 median for Roads & Paving works in CHIRANG (150% above, 144 peer works) | CHIRANG | CHIRANG(Deputy Commissioner Chirang_IDA) | ₹20.00 L | 79.7 | HIGH |