Kasauti can only be opened on a desktop or laptop.
Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
Ranked by how many works are waiting on verification, which is the queue a nodal authority actually has to clear. Open a district to see the agencies behind those works.
| # | District | Works | Completed | Agencies | Sanctioned | To verify | Flagged value | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ADILABAD 1 high risk | 264 | 21 | 1 | ₹7.18 Cr | 89 | ₹1.74 Cr | 28.3 |
| 2 | MAHABUBABAD 1 high risk | 206 | 70 | 1 | ₹8.72 Cr | 50 | ₹3.24 Cr | 27.3 |
| 3 | JAGITIAL 5 high risk | 453 | 208 | 1 | ₹18.15 Cr | 47 | ₹6.26 Cr | 21.1 |
| 4 | JANGOAN | 191 | 100 | 1 | ₹5.19 Cr | 45 | ₹1.33 Cr | 27.4 |
| 5 | RAJANNA SIRCILLA 2 high risk | 204 | 39 | 1 | ₹6.98 Cr | 40 | ₹3.03 Cr | 23.0 |
| 6 | MEDCHAL MALKAJGIRI | 258 | 28 | 1 | ₹19.87 Cr | 25 | ₹3.75 Cr | 20.4 |
| 7 | NIZAMABAD | 654 | 330 | 1 | ₹19.47 Cr | 24 | ₹91.51 L | 15.2 |
| 8 | HYDERABAD 2 high risk | 119 | 30 | 1 | ₹24.76 Cr | 21 | ₹10.43 Cr | 31.6 |
| 9 | HANUMAKONDA | 113 | 23 | 1 | ₹4.17 Cr | 21 | ₹90.49 L | 25.4 |
| 10 | KARIMNAGAR 2 high risk | 332 | 68 | 1 | ₹11.29 Cr | 20 | ₹2.24 Cr | 18.1 |
| 11 | SIDDIPET | 259 | 125 | 1 | ₹12.65 Cr | 19 | ₹3.27 Cr | 14.3 |
| 12 | VIKARABAD | 351 | 122 | 1 | ₹7.94 Cr | 18 | ₹76.46 L | 19.4 |
| 13 | RANGA REDDY | 305 | 182 | 1 | ₹12.85 Cr | 17 | ₹1.59 Cr | 13.9 |
| 14 | MAHABUBNAGAR | 154 | 42 | 1 | ₹5.38 Cr | 17 | ₹1.33 Cr | 18.6 |
| 15 | WANAPARTHY | 85 | 34 | 1 | ₹4.66 Cr | 15 | ₹1.86 Cr | 24.1 |
| 16 | KHAMMAM | 248 | 36 | 1 | ₹12.67 Cr | 13 | ₹3.98 Cr | 14.7 |
| 17 | WARANGAL | 202 | 150 | 1 | ₹4.72 Cr | 11 | ₹91.43 L | 13.6 |
| 18 | NAGARKURNOOL | 153 | 101 | 1 | ₹4.65 Cr | 9 | ₹56.07 L | 13.4 |
| 19 | JOGULAMBA GADWAL | 71 | 39 | 1 | ₹3.39 Cr | 9 | ₹36.00 L | 15.9 |
| 20 | PEDDAPALLI 5 high risk | 56 | 11 | 1 | ₹2.78 Cr | 9 | ₹66.83 L | 31.1 |
| 21 | KUMURAM BHEEM ASIFABAD | 66 | 32 | 1 | ₹1.73 Cr | 7 | ₹17.00 L | 24.2 |
| 22 | SANGAREDDY 1 high risk | 296 | 33 | 1 | ₹9.66 Cr | 6 | ₹92.75 L | 14.2 |
| 23 | MEDAK | 33 | 2 | 1 | ₹2.07 Cr | 6 | ₹58.00 L | 25.0 |
| 24 | YADADRI BHUVANAGIRI | 193 | 171 | 1 | ₹3.10 Cr | 4 | ₹20.99 L | 13.9 |
| 25 | NARAYANPET | 130 | 40 | 1 | ₹4.66 Cr | 3 | ₹17.50 L | 13.2 |
| 26 | BHADRADRI KOTHAGUDEM | 127 | 35 | 1 | ₹5.27 Cr | 3 | ₹36.00 L | 17.8 |
| 27 | MULUGU | 29 | 26 | 1 | ₹72.33 L | 3 | ₹14.99 L | 22.4 |
| 28 | JAYASHANKAR BHUPALAPALLY | 25 | 9 | 1 | ₹81.78 L | 3 | ₹9.00 L | 21.0 |
| 29 | KAITHAL | 4 | 1 | 1 | ₹27.87 L | 3 | ₹23.70 L | 43.8 |
| 30 | SURYAPET | 71 | 44 | 1 | ₹2.72 Cr | 2 | ₹8.20 L | 17.1 |
| 31 | NALGONDA | 196 | 132 | 1 | ₹6.44 Cr | 0 | ₹0 | 11.7 |
| 32 | NIRMAL | 117 | 28 | 1 | ₹3.59 Cr | 0 | ₹0 | 13.5 |
| 33 | KAMAREDDY | 82 | 34 | 1 | ₹3.01 Cr | 0 | ₹0 | 15.9 |
| 34 | MANCHERIAL | 23 | 3 | 1 | ₹2.45 Cr | 0 | ₹0 | 13.2 |
| 35 | PRAKASAM | 4 | 0 | 1 | ₹9.80 L | 0 | ₹0 | 38.1 |
Ordered by the share of allocation actually paid to vendors, lowest first — the members whose funds are moving slowest are the ones a nodal authority chases. “Committed” is money attached to a work but not yet paid; the portal publishes that figure under the name “utilisation”, which is why the two columns differ.
| Member | Allocated | Paid out | Committed | Never committed | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abhishek Manu Singhvi Sitting Rajya Sabha · 16 works | ₹7.34 Cr | 0.0% | 79.4% | ₹1.51 Cr | 13 |
| Renuka Chowdhury Sitting Rajya Sabha · 105 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 2.1% | 31.8% | ₹10.03 Cr | 32 |
| B. Parthasaradhi Reddy Sitting Rajya Sabha · 25 works | ₹24.44 Cr | 2.4% | 18.7% | ₹19.87 Cr | 2 |
| G Kishan Reddy SECUNDERABAD · 38 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 3.2% | 39.9% | ₹8.84 Cr | 1 |
| Kunduru Raghuveer NALGONDA · 29 works | ₹16.30 Cr | 4.8% | 14.7% | ₹13.90 Cr | 0 |
| Asaduddin Owaisi HYDERABAD · 19 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 7.6% | 37.0% | ₹9.26 Cr | 2 |
| Eatala Rajender MALKAJGIRI · 300 works | ₹32.75 Cr | 10.6% | 74.3% | ₹8.43 Cr | 32 |
| Vamsi Krishna Gaddam PEDDAPALLE · 71 works | ₹14.85 Cr | 11.0% | 30.9% | ₹10.25 Cr | 2 |
| Ramasahayam Raghuram Reddy KHAMMAM · 211 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 14.6% | 51.2% | ₹7.18 Cr | 0 |
| Kadiyam Kavya WARANGEL · 214 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 18.5% | 60.2% | ₹5.85 Cr | 66 |
| Suresh Kumar Shetkar ZAHIRABAD · 355 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 20.7% | 68.7% | ₹4.60 Cr | 0 |
| Madhavaneni Raghunandan Rao MEDAK · 182 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 20.7% | 76.7% | ₹3.42 Cr | 14 |
| Godam Nagesh ADILABAD · 357 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 24.3% | 73.2% | ₹3.94 Cr | 10 |
| Konda Vishweshwar Reddy CHELVELLA · 519 works | ₹23.37 Cr | 24.5% | 62.1% | ₹8.85 Cr | 17 |
| D K Aruna MAHABUBNAGAR · 323 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 30.1% | 75.8% | ₹3.55 Cr | 11 |
| Mallu Ravi NAGARKURNOOL · 227 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 32.0% | 69.2% | ₹4.53 Cr | 12 |
| Damodar Rao Divakonda Sitting Rajya Sabha · 295 works | ₹23.99 Cr | 32.1% | 74.9% | ₹6.02 Cr | 169 |
| Anil Kumar Yadav Mandadi Sitting Rajya Sabha · 106 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 37.0% | 67.2% | ₹4.82 Cr | 28 |
| Bandi Sanjay Kumar KARIMNAGAR · 635 works | ₹17.28 Cr | 38.0% | 96.8% | ₹55.19 L | 20 |
| Chamala Kiran Kumar Reddy BHONGIR · 495 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 42.6% | 62.4% | ₹5.53 Cr | 0 |
| Ravi Chandra Vaddiraju Sitting Rajya Sabha · 276 works | ₹15.27 Cr | 48.6% | 86.3% | ₹2.10 Cr | 97 |
| Balram Naik Porika MAHABUBABAD · 360 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 49.2% | 66.7% | ₹4.89 Cr | 21 |
| Arvind Dharmapuri NIZAMABAD · 916 works | ₹28.14 Cr | 56.2% | 95.8% | ₹1.19 Cr | 10 |
Sector is read from each work’s own description, because the portal’s category column says “Normal/Others” on almost every row.
| Sector | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Street Lighting | 1,663 | ₹32.14 Cr | 186 |
| Water | 1,342 | ₹30.94 Cr | 75 |
| Roads & Paving | 1,213 | ₹59.05 Cr | 108 |
| Community Buildings | 1,118 | ₹65.96 Cr | 112 |
| Drainage & Sanitation | 179 | ₹10.56 Cr | 25 |
| Education | 175 | ₹17.32 Cr | 26 |
| Religious & Cultural | 92 | ₹6.33 Cr | 12 |
| Boundary & Protection | 87 | ₹5.00 Cr | 3 |
| Sports | 76 | ₹4.58 Cr | 4 |
| Equipment & Vehicles | 74 | ₹3.65 Cr | 2 |
Patterns across a whole agency or member, not a judgement on any one work — which is why none of these change a work’s score.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
The ten works least like their peers. A score is a reason to look, never a finding of wrongdoing.
| Work | District | Agency | Sanctioned | Score | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Bus 14-Seater LeadAcid
14-Seater Sightseeing Electr ₹1,400,000 against a ₹499,000 median for Equipment & Vehicles works in HYDERABAD (181% above, 18 peer works) | HYDERABAD | HYDERABAD(DISTRICT COLLECTOR HYDERABAD_IDA) | ₹14.00 L | 79.5 | HIGH |
| Construction of Extra Floor on Existing Community Hall at So ₹1,000,000 against a ₹500,000 median for Community Buildings works in ADILABAD (100% above, 112 peer works) | ADILABAD | ADILABAD(DISTRICT COLLECTOR ADILABAD_IDA) | ₹10.00 L | 78.1 | HIGH |
| C/o Comm Hall at Rajaka Colony near water plant at Thimmalak ₹500,000 against a ₹200,000 median for Water works in RAJANNA SIRCILLA (150% above, 116 peer works) | RAJANNA SIRCILLA | RAJANNA SIRCILLA(DISTRICT COLLECTOR RAJANNA SIRCILLA_IDA) | ₹5.00 L | 76.3 | HIGH |
| C/o Comm Hall Hall at Mandala Reddy Colony beside Kummari Sa ₹1,000,000 against a ₹485,106 median for Community Buildings works in RAJANNA SIRCILLA (106% above, 129 peer works) | RAJANNA SIRCILLA | RAJANNA SIRCILLA(DISTRICT COLLECTOR RAJANNA SIRCILLA_IDA) | ₹10.00 L | 76.3 | HIGH |
| Construction of community Hall at Arpanpally Village, Kesamu ₹2,000,000 against a ₹499,000 median for Community Buildings works in MAHABUBABAD (301% above, 28 peer works) | MAHABUBABAD | MAHABUBABAD(DISTRICT COLLECTOR MAHABUBABAD_IDA) | ₹20.00 L | 76.0 | HIGH |
| C/o cultural building at Huzurabad club, Huzurabad ₹3,500,000 against a ₹293,629 median for Religious & Cultural works in KARIMNAGAR (1092% above, 8 peer works) | KARIMNAGAR | KARIMNAGAR(DISTRICT COLLECTOR KARIMNAGAR_IDA) | ₹35.00 L | 75.3 | HIGH |
| Upgrading training facilities and equipment, Developing Mode ₹1,500,000 against a ₹499,000 median for Equipment & Vehicles works in HYDERABAD (201% above, 18 peer works) | HYDERABAD | HYDERABAD(DISTRICT COLLECTOR HYDERABAD_IDA) | ₹15.00 L | 74.3 | HIGH |
| Construction of Compound wall to ZPHS School in Chilvakodur ₹2,500,000 against a ₹500,000 median for Education works in JAGITIAL (400% above, 28 peer works) | JAGITIAL | Jagitial(DISTRICT COLLECTOR JAGTIAL_IDA) | ₹25.00 L | 73.7 | HIGH |
| Construction of Community Hall at Korutla Town of Jagtial Di ₹5,000,000 against a ₹300,000 median for Community Buildings works in JAGITIAL (1567% above, 276 peer works) | JAGITIAL | Jagitial(DISTRICT COLLECTOR JAGTIAL_IDA) | ₹50.00 L | 73.7 | HIGH |
| C/o Library Hall at Buggaram (v) in Jagtial Dist ₹2,500,000 against a ₹500,000 median for Education works in JAGITIAL (400% above, 28 peer works) | JAGITIAL | Jagitial(DISTRICT COLLECTOR JAGTIAL_IDA) | ₹25.00 L | 73.7 | HIGH |
