Kasauti can only be opened on a desktop or laptop.
Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
Ranked by how many works are waiting on verification, which is the queue a nodal authority actually has to clear. Open a district to see the agencies behind those works.
| # | District | Works | Completed | Agencies | Sanctioned | To verify | Flagged value | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ADILABAD 1 high risk | 382 | 85 | 1 | ₹11.28 Cr | 292 | ₹7.54 Cr | 40.2 |
| 2 | MAHABUBNAGAR | 215 | 76 | 1 | ₹10.70 Cr | 93 | ₹5.30 Cr | 37.4 |
| 3 | HYDERABAD 1 high risk | 208 | 90 | 1 | ₹37.80 Cr | 87 | ₹23.73 Cr | 37.3 |
| 4 | VIKARABAD 5 high risk | 135 | 108 | 1 | ₹6.44 Cr | 67 | ₹3.38 Cr | 39.0 |
| 5 | KARIMNAGAR 2 high risk | 276 | 121 | 1 | ₹10.08 Cr | 60 | ₹4.29 Cr | 29.9 |
| 6 | RAJANNA SIRCILLA 2 high risk | 180 | 74 | 1 | ₹7.02 Cr | 59 | ₹3.62 Cr | 34.1 |
| 7 | MAHABUBABAD 1 high risk | 238 | 159 | 1 | ₹10.44 Cr | 57 | ₹3.56 Cr | 28.2 |
| 8 | JAGITIAL 5 high risk | 195 | 106 | 1 | ₹11.81 Cr | 54 | ₹6.55 Cr | 31.3 |
| 9 | KAMAREDDY | 283 | 200 | 1 | ₹5.76 Cr | 48 | ₹1.16 Cr | 29.1 |
| 10 | SANGAREDDY 1 high risk | 261 | 170 | 1 | ₹5.93 Cr | 48 | ₹1.68 Cr | 27.0 |
| 11 | JANGOAN | 150 | 96 | 1 | ₹4.71 Cr | 44 | ₹1.87 Cr | 34.4 |
| 12 | RANGA REDDY 3 high risk | 187 | 148 | 1 | ₹8.29 Cr | 37 | ₹2.78 Cr | 22.2 |
| 13 | HANUMAKONDA | 96 | 71 | 1 | ₹2.99 Cr | 32 | ₹1.01 Cr | 33.7 |
| 14 | KUMURAM BHEEM ASIFABAD | 36 | 7 | 1 | ₹1.19 Cr | 32 | ₹1.07 Cr | 41.7 |
| 15 | KHAMMAM | 266 | 170 | 1 | ₹15.11 Cr | 29 | ₹5.21 Cr | 18.8 |
| 16 | NIZAMABAD | 65 | 17 | 1 | ₹2.25 Cr | 19 | ₹88.88 L | 32.2 |
| 17 | PEDDAPALLI 5 high risk | 35 | 13 | 1 | ₹1.68 Cr | 18 | ₹99.98 L | 37.6 |
| 18 | SIDDIPET | 254 | 145 | 1 | ₹11.86 Cr | 16 | ₹2.62 Cr | 13.7 |
| 19 | WARANGAL | 130 | 108 | 1 | ₹5.57 Cr | 16 | ₹1.60 Cr | 17.5 |
| 20 | SURYAPET | 310 | 289 | 1 | ₹11.72 Cr | 15 | ₹40.79 L | 15.7 |
| 21 | MANCHERIAL | 269 | 231 | 1 | ₹7.23 Cr | 14 | ₹99.00 L | 13.8 |
| 22 | WANAPARTHY | 57 | 25 | 1 | ₹2.78 Cr | 14 | ₹85.94 L | 33.4 |
| 23 | NIRMAL | 51 | 27 | 1 | ₹1.71 Cr | 12 | ₹29.50 L | 24.5 |
| 24 | JOGULAMBA GADWAL | 37 | 23 | 1 | ₹1.10 Cr | 11 | ₹44.00 L | 29.1 |
| 25 | NAGARKURNOOL | 170 | 148 | 1 | ₹6.62 Cr | 10 | ₹45.15 L | 14.8 |
| 26 | NARAYANPET | 77 | 54 | 1 | ₹2.67 Cr | 9 | ₹36.80 L | 22.1 |
| 27 | BHADRADRI KOTHAGUDEM | 136 | 73 | 1 | ₹6.83 Cr | 7 | ₹1.51 Cr | 17.1 |
| 28 | YADADRI BHUVANAGIRI | 194 | 185 | 1 | ₹4.58 Cr | 6 | ₹24.98 L | 16.2 |
| 29 | NALGONDA | 135 | 126 | 1 | ₹4.29 Cr | 6 | ₹17.54 L | 11.5 |
| 30 | MEDAK | 61 | 30 | 1 | ₹2.19 Cr | 5 | ₹23.00 L | 12.0 |
| 31 | KAITHAL | 4 | 1 | 1 | ₹27.87 L | 3 | ₹23.70 L | 43.8 |
| 32 | JAYASHANKAR BHUPALAPALLY | 23 | 19 | 1 | ₹61.90 L | 2 | ₹1.00 L | 19.3 |
| 33 | MEDCHAL MALKAJGIRI | 27 | 18 | 1 | ₹1.73 Cr | 0 | ₹0 | 18.7 |
| 34 | MULUGU | 5 | 4 | 1 | ₹21.93 L | 0 | ₹0 | 19.5 |
Ordered by the share of allocation actually paid to vendors, lowest first — the members whose funds are moving slowest are the ones a nodal authority chases. “Committed” is money attached to a work but not yet paid; the portal publishes that figure under the name “utilisation”, which is why the two columns differ.
| Member | Allocated | Paid out | Committed | Never committed | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arvind Dharmapuri NIZAMABAD | ₹0 | — | 0.0% | ₹0 | 0 |
| Abhishek Manu Singhvi Sitting Rajya Sabha · 16 works | ₹7.34 Cr | 0.0% | 79.4% | ₹1.51 Cr | 13 |
| Renuka Chowdhury Sitting Rajya Sabha · 105 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 2.1% | 31.8% | ₹10.03 Cr | 32 |
| B. Parthasaradhi Reddy Sitting Rajya Sabha · 25 works | ₹24.44 Cr | 2.4% | 18.7% | ₹19.87 Cr | 2 |
| Damodar Rao Divakonda Sitting Rajya Sabha · 295 works | ₹23.99 Cr | 32.1% | 74.9% | ₹6.02 Cr | 169 |
| Anil Kumar Yadav Mandadi Sitting Rajya Sabha · 106 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 37.0% | 67.2% | ₹4.82 Cr | 28 |
| Ravi Chandra Vaddiraju Sitting Rajya Sabha · 276 works | ₹15.27 Cr | 48.6% | 86.3% | ₹2.10 Cr | 97 |
| Kotha Prabhakar Reddy MEDAK · 189 works | ₹9.90 Cr | 52.3% | 92.9% | ₹70.73 L | 0 |
| G Kishan Reddy SECUNDERABAD · 92 works | ₹12.78 Cr | 56.6% | 85.9% | ₹1.81 Cr | 33 |
| Bandi Sanjay Kumar KARIMNAGAR · 531 works | ₹15.46 Cr | 57.1% | 99.4% | ₹9.50 L | 96 |
| Bheemrao Baswanthrao Patil ZAHIRABAD · 573 works | ₹12.32 Cr | 59.2% | 93.8% | ₹76.15 L | 108 |
| Anumula Revanth Reddy MALKAJGIRI · 41 works | ₹2.49 Cr | 65.5% | 99.9% | ₹35,916 | 2 |
| Nama Nageswara Rao KHAMMAM · 242 works | ₹12.39 Cr | 68.5% | 87.2% | ₹1.58 Cr | 19 |
| Asaduddin Owaisi HYDERABAD · 69 works | ₹15.51 Cr | 69.0% | 95.8% | ₹65.05 L | 37 |
| Srinivas Reddy Manne MAHABUBNAGAR · 307 works | ₹12.26 Cr | 72.5% | 99.5% | ₹5.49 L | 98 |
| Venkatesh Netha Borlakunta PEDDAPALLE · 348 works | ₹10.85 Cr | 74.6% | 99.3% | ₹7.82 L | 33 |
| Soyam Bapu Rao ADILABAD · 378 works | ₹13.03 Cr | 79.7% | 95.7% | ₹55.90 L | 250 |
| Ramulu Pothuganti NAGARKURNOOL · 193 works | ₹7.70 Cr | 80.2% | 99.5% | ₹4.10 L | 7 |
| Kavitha Maloth MAHABUBABAD · 199 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 80.3% | 99.7% | ₹2.57 L | 25 |
| Gaddam Ranjith Reddy CHELVELLA · 208 works | ₹10.72 Cr | 81.3% | 99.7% | ₹2.98 L | 84 |
| Komati Reddy Venkat Reddy BHONGIR · 374 works | ₹9.80 Cr | 86.7% | 89.3% | ₹1.05 Cr | 11 |
| Dayakar Pasunoori WARANGEL · 294 works | ₹10.69 Cr | 88.0% | 96.4% | ₹38.08 L | 64 |
| Uttam Kumar Nalamada Reddy NALGONDA · 287 works | ₹10.96 Cr | 95.9% | 99.9% | ₹1.18 L | 14 |
Sector is read from each work’s own description, because the portal’s category column says “Normal/Others” on almost every row.
| Sector | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Street Lighting | 1,583 | ₹30.84 Cr | 270 |
| Roads & Paving | 1,570 | ₹77.37 Cr | 360 |
| Community Buildings | 656 | ₹43.27 Cr | 237 |
| Water | 425 | ₹14.66 Cr | 137 |
| Drainage & Sanitation | 249 | ₹12.09 Cr | 63 |
| Education | 206 | ₹16.00 Cr | 41 |
| Religious & Cultural | 186 | ₹9.87 Cr | 53 |
| Equipment & Vehicles | 118 | ₹5.18 Cr | 29 |
| Boundary & Protection | 64 | ₹4.10 Cr | 8 |
| Sports | 50 | ₹3.93 Cr | 11 |
Patterns across a whole agency or member, not a judgement on any one work — which is why none of these change a work’s score.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
The whole population fails the textbook test — the median agency scores 6.2 where Nigrini calls 1.5 nonconformant — because MPLADS amounts are capped, rounded and repeated by design. This ranks agencies against each other, not against the law. It is the weakest signal here and is never evidence on its own.
The whole population fails the textbook test — the median agency scores 6.2 where Nigrini calls 1.5 nonconformant — because MPLADS amounts are capped, rounded and repeated by design. This ranks agencies against each other, not against the law. It is the weakest signal here and is never evidence on its own.
The whole population fails the textbook test — the median agency scores 6.2 where Nigrini calls 1.5 nonconformant — because MPLADS amounts are capped, rounded and repeated by design. This ranks agencies against each other, not against the law. It is the weakest signal here and is never evidence on its own.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
The whole population fails the textbook test — the median agency scores 6.2 where Nigrini calls 1.5 nonconformant — because MPLADS amounts are capped, rounded and repeated by design. This ranks agencies against each other, not against the law. It is the weakest signal here and is never evidence on its own.
The whole population fails the textbook test — the median agency scores 6.2 where Nigrini calls 1.5 nonconformant — because MPLADS amounts are capped, rounded and repeated by design. This ranks agencies against each other, not against the law. It is the weakest signal here and is never evidence on its own.
The whole population fails the textbook test — the median agency scores 6.2 where Nigrini calls 1.5 nonconformant — because MPLADS amounts are capped, rounded and repeated by design. This ranks agencies against each other, not against the law. It is the weakest signal here and is never evidence on its own.
The ten works least like their peers. A score is a reason to look, never a finding of wrongdoing.
| Work | District | Agency | Sanctioned | Score | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Construction of Extra Floor on Existing Community Hall at So ₹1,000,000 against a ₹500,000 median for Community Buildings works in ADILABAD (100% above, 112 peer works) | ADILABAD | ADILABAD(DISTRICT COLLECTOR ADILABAD_IDA) | ₹10.00 L | 78.1 | HIGH |
| C/o Comm Hall at Rajaka Colony near water plant at Thimmalak ₹500,000 against a ₹200,000 median for Water works in RAJANNA SIRCILLA (150% above, 116 peer works) | RAJANNA SIRCILLA | RAJANNA SIRCILLA(DISTRICT COLLECTOR RAJANNA SIRCILLA_IDA) | ₹5.00 L | 76.3 | HIGH |
| C/o Comm Hall Hall at Mandala Reddy Colony beside Kummari Sa ₹1,000,000 against a ₹485,106 median for Community Buildings works in RAJANNA SIRCILLA (106% above, 129 peer works) | RAJANNA SIRCILLA | RAJANNA SIRCILLA(DISTRICT COLLECTOR RAJANNA SIRCILLA_IDA) | ₹10.00 L | 76.3 | HIGH |
| Construction of community Hall at Arpanpally Village, Kesamu ₹2,000,000 against a ₹499,000 median for Community Buildings works in MAHABUBABAD (301% above, 28 peer works) | MAHABUBABAD | MAHABUBABAD(DISTRICT COLLECTOR MAHABUBABAD_IDA) | ₹20.00 L | 76.0 | HIGH |
| C/o cultural building at Huzurabad club, Huzurabad ₹3,500,000 against a ₹293,629 median for Religious & Cultural works in KARIMNAGAR (1092% above, 8 peer works) | KARIMNAGAR | KARIMNAGAR(DISTRICT COLLECTOR KARIMNAGAR_IDA) | ₹35.00 L | 75.3 | HIGH |
| Electric Bus 14-Seater LeadAcid
14-Seater Sightseeing Electr ₹1,400,000 against a ₹499,000 median for Equipment & Vehicles works in HYDERABAD (181% above, 18 peer works) | HYDERABAD | HYDERABAD(DISTRICT COLLECTOR HYDERABAD_IDA) | ₹14.00 L | 74.9 | HIGH |
| Construction of Compound wall to ZPHS School in Chilvakodur ₹2,500,000 against a ₹500,000 median for Education works in JAGITIAL (400% above, 28 peer works) | JAGITIAL | Jagitial(DISTRICT COLLECTOR JAGTIAL_IDA) | ₹25.00 L | 73.7 | HIGH |
| Construction of Community Hall at Korutla Town of Jagtial Di ₹5,000,000 against a ₹300,000 median for Community Buildings works in JAGITIAL (1567% above, 276 peer works) | JAGITIAL | Jagitial(DISTRICT COLLECTOR JAGTIAL_IDA) | ₹50.00 L | 73.7 | HIGH |
| C/o Library Hall at Buggaram (v) in Jagtial Dist ₹2,500,000 against a ₹500,000 median for Education works in JAGITIAL (400% above, 28 peer works) | JAGITIAL | Jagitial(DISTRICT COLLECTOR JAGTIAL_IDA) | ₹25.00 L | 73.7 | HIGH |
| C/o Culvert at Muddapally (v) Pegadapally (m) in Jagtial Dis ₹1,000,000 against a ₹499,992 median for Roads & Paving works in JAGITIAL (100% above, 117 peer works) | JAGITIAL | Jagitial(DISTRICT COLLECTOR JAGTIAL_IDA) | ₹10.00 L | 73.7 | HIGH |
