Kasauti can only be opened on a desktop or laptop.
Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
Ranked by how many works are waiting on verification, which is the queue a nodal authority actually has to clear. Open a district to see the agencies behind those works.
| # | District | Works | Completed | Agencies | Sanctioned | To verify | Flagged value | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MURSHIDABAD 1 high risk | 573 | 179 | 1 | ₹29.54 Cr | 105 | ₹9.32 Cr | 21.7 |
| 2 | NORTH 24 PARGANAS 24 high risk | 356 | 111 | 1 | ₹50.62 Cr | 98 | ₹19.39 Cr | 31.2 |
| 3 | SOUTH 24 PARGANAS 1 high risk | 880 | 565 | 1 | ₹33.12 Cr | 96 | ₹6.06 Cr | 19.0 |
| 4 | UTTAR DINAJPUR | 409 | 99 | 1 | ₹16.52 Cr | 79 | ₹5.02 Cr | 25.8 |
| 5 | COOCH BEHAR 5 high risk | 125 | 2 | 1 | ₹22.99 Cr | 72 | ₹18.18 Cr | 40.5 |
| 6 | BANKURA 2 high risk | 175 | 73 | 1 | ₹18.65 Cr | 56 | ₹9.27 Cr | 32.2 |
| 7 | PASCHIM MEDINIPUR | 297 | 199 | 1 | ₹36.60 Cr | 52 | ₹11.51 Cr | 25.8 |
| 8 | PURBA MEDINIPUR 2 high risk | 374 | 128 | 1 | ₹23.65 Cr | 47 | ₹7.51 Cr | 16.8 |
| 9 | PURBA BARDHAMAN | 285 | 46 | 1 | ₹26.35 Cr | 45 | ₹12.01 Cr | 25.1 |
| 10 | KOLKATA 7 high risk | 191 | 51 | 1 | ₹54.96 Cr | 42 | ₹40.67 Cr | 27.7 |
| 11 | HOOGHLY 1 high risk | 391 | 209 | 1 | ₹28.76 Cr | 29 | ₹4.79 Cr | 17.9 |
| 12 | PASCHIM BARDHAMAN 1 high risk | 71 | 7 | 1 | ₹13.17 Cr | 28 | ₹7.68 Cr | 30.9 |
| 13 | DAKSHIN DINAJPUR | 187 | 33 | 1 | ₹8.56 Cr | 27 | ₹1.83 Cr | 26.7 |
| 14 | NADIA 1 high risk | 340 | 122 | 1 | ₹27.63 Cr | 26 | ₹6.58 Cr | 16.7 |
| 15 | PURULIA | 142 | 31 | 1 | ₹15.16 Cr | 25 | ₹5.86 Cr | 29.0 |
| 16 | DARJEELING | 140 | 60 | 1 | ₹9.31 Cr | 16 | ₹2.04 Cr | 19.5 |
| 17 | MALDA | 143 | 34 | 1 | ₹8.43 Cr | 12 | ₹2.26 Cr | 23.2 |
| 18 | ALIPURDUAR | 78 | 10 | 1 | ₹7.98 Cr | 10 | ₹2.02 Cr | 25.8 |
| 19 | BIRBHUM | 243 | 173 | 1 | ₹27.53 Cr | 8 | ₹1.79 Cr | 14.8 |
| 20 | JALPAIGURI | 24 | 2 | 1 | ₹4.57 Cr | 5 | ₹91.80 L | 27.6 |
| 21 | HOWRAH | 417 | 238 | 1 | ₹21.74 Cr | 2 | ₹65.00 L | 8.0 |
| 22 | JHARGRAM | 46 | 32 | 1 | ₹8.41 Cr | 0 | ₹0 | 20.5 |
| 23 | KALIMPONG | 36 | 22 | 1 | ₹1.87 Cr | 0 | ₹0 | 10.8 |
Ordered by the share of allocation actually paid to vendors, lowest first — the members whose funds are moving slowest are the ones a nodal authority chases. “Committed” is money attached to a work but not yet paid; the portal publishes that figure under the name “utilisation”, which is why the two columns differ.
| Member | Allocated | Paid out | Committed | Never committed | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rajeev Kumar Sitting Rajya Sabha | ₹4.90 Cr | 0.0% | 0.0% | ₹4.90 Cr | 0 |
| Harsh Vardhan Shringla Nominated Rajya Sabha · 6 works | ₹7.35 Cr | 0.0% | 12.9% | ₹6.40 Cr | 2 |
| Prakash Chik Baraik Sitting Rajya Sabha | ₹4.97 Cr | 0.0% | 0.0% | ₹4.97 Cr | 0 |
| Khagen Murmu MALDAHA UTTAR · 38 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 4.1% | 28.0% | ₹10.58 Cr | 4 |
| Shantanu Thakur BANGAON · 58 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 4.1% | 71.7% | ₹4.16 Cr | 0 |
| Isha Khan Choudhury MALDAHA DAKSHIN · 123 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 5.8% | 37.4% | ₹9.20 Cr | 6 |
| Pathan Yusuf BAHARAMPUR · 145 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 6.4% | 60.3% | ₹5.83 Cr | 71 |
| Manoj Tigga ALIPURDUARS · 90 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 7.7% | 67.9% | ₹4.72 Cr | 15 |
| Jyotirmay Singh Mahato PURULIA · 103 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 8.0% | 48.5% | ₹7.57 Cr | 13 |
| Jayanta Kumar Roy JALPAIGURI · 19 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 8.2% | 22.2% | ₹11.44 Cr | 4 |
| Sougata Ray DUM DUM · 52 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 9.6% | 39.0% | ₹8.96 Cr | 4 |
| Kartick Chandra Paul RAIGANJ · 408 works | ₹20.27 Cr | 13.9% | 81.1% | ₹3.82 Cr | 79 |
| Sharmila Sarkar BARDHAMAN PURBA · 111 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 14.4% | 58.3% | ₹6.13 Cr | 15 |
| Khalilur Rahaman JANGIPUR · 107 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 15.7% | 53.5% | ₹6.84 Cr | 16 |
| Sukanta Majumdar BALURGHAT · 186 works | ₹15.71 Cr | 16.7% | 54.5% | ₹7.14 Cr | 27 |
| Azad Kirti Jha BARDHAMAN-DURGAPUR · 112 works | ₹17.97 Cr | 18.5% | 50.5% | ₹8.89 Cr | 14 |
| Samik Bhattacharya Sitting Rajya Sabha · 51 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 19.6% | 46.4% | ₹7.88 Cr | 25 |
| Partha Bhowmick BARRACKPUR · 32 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 21.2% | 96.1% | ₹57.15 L | 7 |
| Jagadish Chandra Barma Basunia COOCHBEHAR · 97 works | ₹16.86 Cr | 21.8% | 70.8% | ₹4.92 Cr | 57 |
| Rachna Banerjee HOOGHLY · 101 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 23.3% | 66.3% | ₹4.95 Cr | 12 |
| June Maliah MEDINIPUR · 31 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 25.1% | 65.6% | ₹5.05 Cr | 8 |
| Abu Taher Khan MURSHIDABAD · 328 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 25.3% | 67.0% | ₹4.86 Cr | 5 |
| Adhikari Soumendu KANTHI · 70 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 26.1% | 65.3% | ₹5.11 Cr | 38 |
| Bapi Haldar MATHURAPUR · 169 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 26.8% | 55.9% | ₹6.49 Cr | 18 |
| Abhijit Gangopadhyay TAMLUK · 265 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 28.2% | 64.5% | ₹5.22 Cr | 5 |
| Jagannath Sarkar RANAGHAT · 219 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 28.4% | 76.6% | ₹3.44 Cr | 8 |
| Raju Bista DARJEELING · 169 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 29.7% | 69.3% | ₹4.52 Cr | 13 |
| Mamata Thakur Sitting Rajya Sabha · 60 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 30.2% | 37.2% | ₹9.23 Cr | 15 |
| Mohammed Nadimul Haque Sitting Rajya Sabha · 19 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 30.7% | 65.8% | ₹5.02 Cr | 12 |
| Sudip Bandyopadhyay KOLKATA UTTAR · 37 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 31.5% | 54.2% | ₹6.74 Cr | 14 |
| Sagarika Ghose Sitting Rajya Sabha · 13 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 32.2% | 66.3% | ₹4.95 Cr | 11 |
| Sajda Ahmed ULUBERIA · 174 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 32.4% | 64.6% | ₹5.21 Cr | 2 |
| Satabdi Roy BIRBHUM · 95 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 32.9% | 49.0% | ₹7.50 Cr | 4 |
| Sayani Ghosh JADAVPUR · 214 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 33.9% | 58.0% | ₹6.17 Cr | 48 |
| Mahua Moitra KRISHNANAGAR · 55 works | ₹15.99 Cr | 35.9% | 69.6% | ₹4.86 Cr | 12 |
| Bag Mitali ARAMBAG · 186 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 36.2% | 74.0% | ₹3.83 Cr | 5 |
| Arup Chakraborty BANKURA · 70 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 38.0% | 64.4% | ₹5.24 Cr | 8 |
| Saumitra Khan BISHNUPUR · 82 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 39.2% | 65.8% | ₹5.03 Cr | 46 |
| Dola Sen Sitting Rajya Sabha · 27 works | ₹17.15 Cr | 40.5% | 71.3% | ₹4.92 Cr | 9 |
| Derek O' Brien Sitting Rajya Sabha · 35 works | ₹17.15 Cr | 41.3% | 71.3% | ₹4.92 Cr | 7 |
| Samirul Islam Sitting Rajya Sabha · 57 works | ₹17.15 Cr | 41.5% | 70.8% | ₹5.00 Cr | 10 |
| Mala Roy KOLKATA DAKSHIN · 75 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 41.9% | 65.4% | ₹5.09 Cr | 8 |
| Kakoli Ghosh Dastidar BARASAT · 185 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 42.1% | 80.2% | ₹2.91 Cr | 63 |
| Adhikari Deepak Dev GHATAL · 205 works | ₹20.07 Cr | 43.7% | 95.3% | ₹94.53 L | 33 |
| Shatrughan Prasad Sinha ASANSOL · 36 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 45.6% | 72.5% | ₹4.04 Cr | 22 |
| Prasun Banerjee HOWRAH · 227 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 48.1% | 70.2% | ₹4.38 Cr | 0 |
| Abhishek Banerjee DIAMOND HARBOUR · 320 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 48.6% | 65.1% | ₹5.13 Cr | 11 |
| Kalipada Saren Kherwal JHARGRAM · 63 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 48.8% | 77.2% | ₹3.35 Cr | 3 |
| Pratima Mondal JOYNAGAR · 223 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 50.6% | 66.6% | ₹4.91 Cr | 27 |
| Kalyan Banerjee SREERAMPUR · 119 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 52.2% | 64.9% | ₹5.16 Cr | 1 |
| Nagendra Ray Sitting Rajya Sabha · 22 works | ₹17.15 Cr | 53.5% | 71.4% | ₹4.91 Cr | 13 |
| Asit Kumar Mal BOLPUR · 202 works | ₹27.57 Cr | 60.8% | 88.3% | ₹3.23 Cr | 10 |
| Nurul Islam BASIRHAT · 32 works | ₹4.90 Cr | 62.7% | 99.0% | ₹4.89 L | 20 |
Sector is read from each work’s own description, because the portal’s category column says “Normal/Others” on almost every row.
| Sector | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Street Lighting | 2,576 | ₹135.86 Cr | 371 |
| Roads & Paving | 1,401 | ₹116.97 Cr | 136 |
| Education | 420 | ₹52.58 Cr | 50 |
| Water | 408 | ₹26.71 Cr | 51 |
| Community Buildings | 327 | ₹42.80 Cr | 60 |
| Religious & Cultural | 210 | ₹14.96 Cr | 87 |
| Equipment & Vehicles | 133 | ₹47.15 Cr | 42 |
| Drainage & Sanitation | 118 | ₹10.08 Cr | 11 |
| Sports | 96 | ₹19.62 Cr | 21 |
| Health | 96 | ₹18.26 Cr | 16 |
Patterns across a whole agency or member, not a judgement on any one work — which is why none of these change a work’s score.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
The whole population fails the textbook test — the median agency scores 6.2 where Nigrini calls 1.5 nonconformant — because MPLADS amounts are capped, rounded and repeated by design. This ranks agencies against each other, not against the law. It is the weakest signal here and is never evidence on its own.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
The whole population fails the textbook test — the median agency scores 6.2 where Nigrini calls 1.5 nonconformant — because MPLADS amounts are capped, rounded and repeated by design. This ranks agencies against each other, not against the law. It is the weakest signal here and is never evidence on its own.
The ten works least like their peers. A score is a reason to look, never a finding of wrongdoing.
| Work | District | Agency | Sanctioned | Score | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Construction of Paver Block road with GSB subgrade from Tors ₹8,245,381 against a ₹2,302,669 median for Roads & Paving works in COOCH BEHAR (258% above, 32 peer works) | COOCH BEHAR | Cooch Behar(DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COOCHBEHAR_IDA) | ₹82.45 L | 77.2 | HIGH |
| Construction of Paver Block road with GSB subgrade from A ₹6,496,211 against a ₹2,302,669 median for Roads & Paving works in COOCH BEHAR (182% above, 32 peer works) | COOCH BEHAR | Cooch Behar(DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COOCHBEHAR_IDA) | ₹64.96 L | 77.2 | HIGH |
| Construction of Paver Block road with GSB subgrade from Nat ₹8,617,886 against a ₹2,302,669 median for Roads & Paving works in COOCH BEHAR (274% above, 32 peer works) | COOCH BEHAR | Cooch Behar(DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COOCHBEHAR_IDA) | ₹86.18 L | 77.2 | HIGH |
| 1 Installation of Solar Street Light 57 Nos at road site of ₹2,843,160 against a ₹586,716 median for Street Lighting works in COOCH BEHAR (385% above, 155 peer works) | COOCH BEHAR | Cooch Behar(DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COOCHBEHAR_IDA) | ₹28.43 L | 77.2 | HIGH |
| Installation of 9 no Mini High Mast Solar Street Light Syste ₹5,280,444 against a ₹586,716 median for Street Lighting works in COOCH BEHAR (800% above, 155 peer works) | COOCH BEHAR | Cooch Behar(DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COOCHBEHAR_IDA) | ₹52.80 L | 77.2 | HIGH |
| CONSTRUCTION OF SCHOOL BUILDING OF ANJUMAN GIRLS PRIMARY SCH ₹2,500,000 against a ₹1,000,000 median for Education works in KOLKATA (150% above, 35 peer works) | KOLKATA | KOLKATA(COMMISSIONER KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION_IDA) | ₹25.00 L | 75.2 | HIGH |
| DEVELOPMENT OF THE BHAWANIPUR GUJRATI EDUCATION SOCIETY. 5 L ₹5,000,000 against a ₹1,000,000 median for Education works in KOLKATA (400% above, 35 peer works) | KOLKATA | KOLKATA(COMMISSIONER KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION_IDA) | ₹50.00 L | 75.2 | HIGH |
| Provision of an ambulance with advanced life support system( ₹3,075,000 against a ₹700,000 median for Roads & Paving works in NORTH 24 PARGANAS (339% above, 148 peer works) | NORTH 24 PARGANAS | North 24 Parganas(DISTRICT MAGISTRATE NORTH TWENTY FOUR PARGANAS_IDA) | ₹30.75 L | 75.0 | HIGH |
| Construction for Canteen at Ground Floor and modification of ₹6,763,570 against a ₹2,000,000 median for Community Buildings works in NORTH 24 PARGANAS (238% above, 38 peer works) | NORTH 24 PARGANAS | North 24 Parganas(DISTRICT MAGISTRATE NORTH TWENTY FOUR PARGANAS_IDA) | ₹67.64 L | 74.6 | HIGH |
| Boundary fencing ₹2,600,000 against a ₹200,000 median for Boundary & Protection works in BANKURA (1200% above, 22 peer works) | BANKURA | BANKURA(DISTRICT MAGISTRATE BANKURA_IDA) | ₹26.00 L | 73.7 | HIGH |
