Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
Ranked by how many works are waiting on verification, which is the queue a nodal authority actually has to clear. Open a district to see the agencies behind those works.
| # | District | Works | Completed | Agencies | Sanctioned | To verify | Flagged value | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MALDA 4 high risk | 579 | 285 | 1 | ₹19.40 Cr | 218 | ₹8.84 Cr | 34.3 |
| 2 | MURSHIDABAD 1 high risk | 681 | 567 | 1 | ₹54.82 Cr | 96 | ₹15.64 Cr | 28.1 |
| 3 | BANKURA 6 high risk | 319 | 208 | 1 | ₹24.00 Cr | 96 | ₹12.07 Cr | 32.6 |
| 4 | PASCHIM MEDINIPUR 3 high risk | 370 | 297 | 1 | ₹22.00 Cr | 86 | ₹9.31 Cr | 31.4 |
| 5 | PURBA BARDHAMAN | 267 | 132 | 1 | ₹27.46 Cr | 85 | ₹14.89 Cr | 30.2 |
| 6 | PURULIA 1 high risk | 251 | 155 | 1 | ₹15.26 Cr | 84 | ₹9.88 Cr | 37.4 |
| 7 | NORTH 24 PARGANAS 4 high risk | 285 | 195 | 1 | ₹46.11 Cr | 76 | ₹14.15 Cr | 28.2 |
| 8 | SOUTH 24 PARGANAS | 664 | 525 | 1 | ₹27.08 Cr | 56 | ₹5.10 Cr | 18.2 |
| 9 | KOLKATA 7 high risk | 162 | 86 | 1 | ₹51.04 Cr | 52 | ₹39.80 Cr | 29.0 |
| 10 | COOCH BEHAR 5 high risk | 100 | 49 | 1 | ₹18.23 Cr | 44 | ₹14.46 Cr | 42.6 |
| 11 | ALIPURDUAR | 68 | 32 | 1 | ₹4.96 Cr | 36 | ₹2.29 Cr | 39.6 |
| 12 | UTTAR DINAJPUR | 108 | 60 | 1 | ₹5.60 Cr | 29 | ₹2.32 Cr | 25.9 |
| 13 | HOOGHLY 1 high risk | 607 | 588 | 1 | ₹24.40 Cr | 23 | ₹2.29 Cr | 22.0 |
| 14 | JALPAIGURI | 55 | 40 | 1 | ₹6.13 Cr | 20 | ₹1.95 Cr | 32.3 |
| 15 | DAKSHIN DINAJPUR 2 high risk | 330 | 276 | 1 | ₹5.97 Cr | 16 | ₹95.20 L | 17.3 |
| 16 | PASCHIM BARDHAMAN 1 high risk | 107 | 85 | 1 | ₹7.74 Cr | 16 | ₹1.92 Cr | 24.2 |
| 17 | NADIA 1 high risk | 232 | 196 | 1 | ₹15.91 Cr | 15 | ₹2.57 Cr | 16.7 |
| 18 | PURBA MEDINIPUR 2 high risk | 378 | 333 | 1 | ₹22.49 Cr | 11 | ₹1.41 Cr | 16.2 |
| 19 | DARJEELING | 110 | 84 | 1 | ₹7.38 Cr | 10 | ₹1.52 Cr | 16.3 |
| 20 | BIRBHUM | 180 | 173 | 1 | ₹13.21 Cr | 8 | ₹92.57 L | 14.3 |
| 21 | HOWRAH | 345 | 343 | 1 | ₹16.82 Cr | 2 | ₹24.25 L | 10.2 |
| 22 | JHARGRAM | 41 | 32 | 1 | ₹9.07 Cr | 2 | ₹74.25 L | 21.8 |
| 23 | KALIMPONG | 17 | 13 | 1 | ₹1.30 Cr | 1 | ₹25.00 L | 17.8 |
Ordered by the share of allocation actually paid to vendors, lowest first — the members whose funds are moving slowest are the ones a nodal authority chases. “Committed” is money attached to a work but not yet paid; the portal publishes that figure under the name “utilisation”, which is why the two columns differ.
| Member | Allocated | Paid out | Committed | Never committed | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rajeev Kumar Sitting Rajya Sabha | ₹4.90 Cr | 0.0% | 0.0% | ₹4.90 Cr | 0 |
| Prakash Chik Baraik Sitting Rajya Sabha | ₹4.97 Cr | 0.0% | 0.0% | ₹4.97 Cr | 0 |
| Harsh Vardhan Shringla Nominated Rajya Sabha · 6 works | ₹7.35 Cr | 0.0% | 12.9% | ₹6.40 Cr | 2 |
| Samik Bhattacharya Sitting Rajya Sabha · 51 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 19.6% | 46.4% | ₹7.88 Cr | 25 |
| Mamata Thakur Sitting Rajya Sabha · 60 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 30.2% | 37.2% | ₹9.23 Cr | 15 |
| Mohammed Nadimul Haque Sitting Rajya Sabha · 19 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 30.7% | 65.8% | ₹5.02 Cr | 12 |
| Jyotirmay Singh Mahato PURULIA · 131 works | ₹11.77 Cr | 31.6% | 78.9% | ₹2.49 Cr | 75 |
| Sagarika Ghose Sitting Rajya Sabha · 13 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 32.2% | 66.3% | ₹4.95 Cr | 9 |
| Khagen Murmu MALDAHA UTTAR · 270 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 35.1% | 68.8% | ₹3.06 Cr | 112 |
| Debasree Chaudhuri RAIGANJ · 73 works | ₹4.91 Cr | 35.4% | 90.2% | ₹48.21 L | 28 |
| Jayanta Kumar Roy JALPAIGURI · 50 works | ₹11.77 Cr | 37.7% | 52.7% | ₹5.57 Cr | 16 |
| Dola Sen Sitting Rajya Sabha · 27 works | ₹17.15 Cr | 40.5% | 71.3% | ₹4.92 Cr | 9 |
| Derek O' Brien Sitting Rajya Sabha · 35 works | ₹17.15 Cr | 41.3% | 71.3% | ₹4.92 Cr | 7 |
| Samirul Islam Sitting Rajya Sabha · 57 works | ₹17.15 Cr | 41.5% | 70.8% | ₹5.00 Cr | 10 |
| Nisith Pramanik COOCHBEHAR · 31 works | ₹5.20 Cr | 44.0% | 60.6% | ₹2.05 Cr | 24 |
| Nagendra Ray Sitting Rajya Sabha · 22 works | ₹17.15 Cr | 53.5% | 71.4% | ₹4.91 Cr | 13 |
| Abu Hasem Khan Choudhury MALDAHA DAKSHIN · 314 works | ₹14.71 Cr | 56.8% | 87.8% | ₹1.80 Cr | 104 |
| Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury BAHARAMPUR · 205 works | ₹22.06 Cr | 59.5% | 69.3% | ₹6.78 Cr | 16 |
| S.S. Ahluwalia BARDHAMAN-DURGAPUR · 195 works | ₹14.22 Cr | 60.9% | 81.0% | ₹2.70 Cr | 53 |
| Shatrughan Prasad Sinha ASANSOL · 81 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 64.8% | 89.8% | ₹74.71 L | 12 |
| John Barla ALIPURDUARS · 118 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 65.1% | 87.8% | ₹1.19 Cr | 46 |
| Sudip Bandyopadhyay KOLKATA UTTAR · 57 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 67.0% | 85.0% | ₹1.47 Cr | 19 |
| Raju Bista DARJEELING · 123 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 67.5% | 80.2% | ₹1.94 Cr | 8 |
| Dilip Ghosh MEDINIPUR · 165 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 69.0% | 87.5% | ₹1.23 Cr | 52 |
| Subhas Sarkar BANKURA · 289 works | ₹14.14 Cr | 70.0% | 98.8% | ₹16.61 L | 57 |
| Mala Roy KOLKATA DAKSHIN · 57 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 75.4% | 95.9% | ₹30.47 L | 19 |
| Khalilur Rahaman JANGIPUR · 305 works | ₹19.61 Cr | 80.6% | 97.6% | ₹47.12 L | 56 |
| Sukanta Majumdar BALURGHAT · 360 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 80.8% | 94.8% | ₹38.62 L | 17 |
| Abu Taher Khan MURSHIDABAD · 211 works | ₹22.06 Cr | 81.4% | 95.3% | ₹1.04 Cr | 21 |
| Sougata Ray DUM DUM · 72 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 82.6% | 99.1% | ₹6.74 L | 20 |
| Jagannath Sarkar RANAGHAT · 142 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 83.3% | 93.0% | ₹51.53 L | 8 |
| Choudhury Mohan Jatua MATHURAPUR · 123 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 84.2% | 99.2% | ₹5.79 L | 11 |
| Saumitra Khan BISHNUPUR · 98 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 84.8% | 96.7% | ₹32.72 L | 38 |
| Adhikari Deepak Dev GHATAL · 204 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 85.3% | 93.0% | ₹68.43 L | 28 |
| Prasun Banerjee HOWRAH · 151 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 85.3% | 86.8% | ₹1.30 Cr | 1 |
| Kakoli Ghosh Dastidar BARASAT · 73 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 89.1% | 99.5% | ₹3.86 L | 22 |
| Sunil Kumar Mondal BARDHAMAN PURBA · 45 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 90.3% | 99.3% | ₹7.11 L | 20 |
| Dibyendu Adhikari TAMLUK · 229 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 90.9% | 92.1% | ₹77.66 L | 2 |
| Arjun Singh BARRACKPUR · 53 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 91.6% | 95.8% | ₹41.29 L | 5 |
| Mimi Chakraborty JADAVPUR · 257 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 91.9% | 95.4% | ₹33.59 L | 6 |
| Satabdi Roy BIRBHUM · 130 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 92.6% | 93.5% | ₹47.51 L | 5 |
| Kalyan Banerjee SREERAMPUR · 113 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 93.4% | 95.2% | ₹35.13 L | 5 |
| Asit Kumar Mal BOLPUR · 59 works | ₹7.11 Cr | 94.1% | 99.9% | ₹99,704 | 3 |
| Shantanu Thakur BANGAON · 41 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 94.6% | 99.7% | ₹2.79 L | 5 |
| Pratima Mondal JOYNAGAR · 146 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 95.0% | 98.6% | ₹10.25 L | 15 |
| Abhishek Banerjee DIAMOND HARBOUR · 154 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 95.0% | 97.6% | ₹17.77 L | 26 |
| Sajda Ahmed ULUBERIA · 180 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 96.0% | 96.0% | ₹29.70 L | 0 |
| Sisir Kumar Adhikari KANTHI · 85 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 96.8% | 97.9% | ₹20.95 L | 2 |
| Nussrat Jahan BASIRHAT · 29 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 99.0% | 99.8% | ₹1.36 L | 14 |
| Aparupa Poddar ARAMBAG · 181 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 99.2% | 99.4% | ₹4.09 L | 1 |
| Kunar Hembram JHARGRAM · 32 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 99.4% | 99.4% | ₹4.31 L | 4 |
| Locket Chatterjee HOOGHLY · 307 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 99.6% | 99.6% | ₹3.79 L | 4 |
| Mahua Moitra KRISHNANAGAR · 27 works | ₹4.43 Cr | 100.0% | 100.0% | ₹0 | 0 |
Sector is read from each work’s own description, because the portal’s category column says “Normal/Others” on almost every row.
| Sector | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Street Lighting | 2,988 | ₹113.35 Cr | 412 |
| Roads & Paving | 1,256 | ₹109.62 Cr | 215 |
| Water | 671 | ₹44.47 Cr | 136 |
| Education | 383 | ₹53.86 Cr | 87 |
| Community Buildings | 294 | ₹33.07 Cr | 86 |
| Religious & Cultural | 235 | ₹15.85 Cr | 36 |
| Boundary & Protection | 112 | ₹8.26 Cr | 19 |
| Drainage & Sanitation | 98 | ₹9.35 Cr | 24 |
| Sports | 75 | ₹7.92 Cr | 20 |
| Health | 73 | ₹13.52 Cr | 26 |
Patterns across a whole agency or member, not a judgement on any one work — which is why none of these change a work’s score.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
The whole population fails the textbook test — the median agency scores 6.2 where Nigrini calls 1.5 nonconformant — because MPLADS amounts are capped, rounded and repeated by design. This ranks agencies against each other, not against the law. It is the weakest signal here and is never evidence on its own.
The whole population fails the textbook test — the median agency scores 6.2 where Nigrini calls 1.5 nonconformant — because MPLADS amounts are capped, rounded and repeated by design. This ranks agencies against each other, not against the law. It is the weakest signal here and is never evidence on its own.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
The ten works least like their peers. A score is a reason to look, never a finding of wrongdoing.
| Work | District | Agency | Sanctioned | Score | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Construction of Paver Block road with GSB subgrade from Tors ₹8,245,381 against a ₹2,302,669 median for Roads & Paving works in COOCH BEHAR (258% above, 32 peer works) | COOCH BEHAR | Cooch Behar(DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COOCHBEHAR_IDA) | ₹82.45 L | 77.2 | HIGH |
| Construction of Paver Block road with GSB subgrade from A ₹6,496,211 against a ₹2,302,669 median for Roads & Paving works in COOCH BEHAR (182% above, 32 peer works) | COOCH BEHAR | Cooch Behar(DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COOCHBEHAR_IDA) | ₹64.96 L | 77.2 | HIGH |
| Construction of Paver Block road with GSB subgrade from Nat ₹8,617,886 against a ₹2,302,669 median for Roads & Paving works in COOCH BEHAR (274% above, 32 peer works) | COOCH BEHAR | Cooch Behar(DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COOCHBEHAR_IDA) | ₹86.18 L | 77.2 | HIGH |
| 1 Installation of Solar Street Light 57 Nos at road site of ₹2,843,160 against a ₹586,716 median for Street Lighting works in COOCH BEHAR (385% above, 155 peer works) | COOCH BEHAR | Cooch Behar(DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COOCHBEHAR_IDA) | ₹28.43 L | 77.2 | HIGH |
| Installation of 9 no Mini High Mast Solar Street Light Syste ₹5,280,444 against a ₹586,716 median for Street Lighting works in COOCH BEHAR (800% above, 155 peer works) | COOCH BEHAR | Cooch Behar(DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COOCHBEHAR_IDA) | ₹52.80 L | 77.2 | HIGH |
| Construction of P.C.C Open Mancha infront of Manikora Maa Ka ₹823,000 against a ₹400,000 median for Religious & Cultural works in MALDA (106% above, 33 peer works) | MALDA | Malda(DISTRICT MAGISTRATE MALDA_IDA) | ₹8.23 L | 76.3 | HIGH |
| Construction of P.C.C Open Mancha infront of Manikora Maa Ka ₹823,000 against a ₹400,000 median for Religious & Cultural works in MALDA (106% above, 33 peer works) | MALDA | Malda(DISTRICT MAGISTRATE MALDA_IDA) | ₹8.23 L | 76.3 | HIGH |
| Installation of Electric high mast light in front of bakha ₹500,000 against a ₹200,000 median for Street Lighting works in MALDA (150% above, 436 peer works) | MALDA | Malda(DISTRICT MAGISTRATE MALDA_IDA) | ₹5.00 L | 76.1 | HIGH |
| Installation of Electric high mast light in front of bakha ₹500,000 against a ₹200,000 median for Street Lighting works in MALDA (150% above, 436 peer works) | MALDA | Malda(DISTRICT MAGISTRATE MALDA_IDA) | ₹5.00 L | 76.1 | HIGH |
| CONSTRUCTION OF SCHOOL BUILDING OF ANJUMAN GIRLS PRIMARY SCH ₹2,500,000 against a ₹1,000,000 median for Education works in KOLKATA (150% above, 35 peer works) | KOLKATA | KOLKATA(COMMISSIONER KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION_IDA) | ₹25.00 L | 75.2 | HIGH |