Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
Ranked by how many works are waiting on verification, which is the queue a nodal authority actually has to clear. Open a district to see the agencies behind those works.
| # | District | Works | Completed | Agencies | Sanctioned | To verify | Flagged value | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JAMMU | 96 | 65 | 1 | ₹5.34 Cr | 15 | ₹1.72 Cr | 22.4 |
| 2 | KATHUA | 50 | 43 | 1 | ₹1.71 Cr | 4 | ₹30.01 L | 12.9 |
| 3 | RAMBAN | 26 | 16 | 1 | ₹1.04 Cr | 4 | ₹67.20 L | 19.6 |
| 4 | BANDIPORA | 166 | 146 | 1 | ₹4.84 Cr | 3 | ₹28.42 L | 12.8 |
| 5 | SHAHJAHANPUR | 139 | 139 | 1 | ₹7.92 Cr | 3 | ₹4.62 Cr | 24.9 |
| 6 | KISHTWAR | 32 | 15 | 1 | ₹2.81 Cr | 3 | ₹1.31 Cr | 16.7 |
| 7 | KUPWARA | 26 | 16 | 1 | ₹98.03 L | 3 | ₹41.00 L | 19.5 |
| 8 | PILIBHIT | 3 | 3 | 1 | ₹1.27 Cr | 3 | ₹1.27 Cr | 48.0 |
| 9 | ANANTNAG | 175 | 169 | 1 | ₹2.34 Cr | 2 | ₹7.77 L | 24.6 |
| 10 | PULWAMA | 122 | 108 | 1 | ₹3.96 Cr | 2 | ₹12.35 L | 10.8 |
| 11 | UDHAMPUR | 22 | 14 | 1 | ₹1.81 Cr | 2 | ₹1.12 Cr | 17.5 |
| 12 | POONCH | 13 | 2 | 1 | ₹60.22 L | 2 | ₹31.00 L | 24.3 |
| 13 | DODA | 35 | 29 | 1 | ₹1.29 Cr | 1 | ₹58.30 L | 9.7 |
| 14 | BARAMULLA | 22 | 19 | 1 | ₹61.71 L | 1 | ₹2.99 L | 12.8 |
| 15 | RAJOURI | 17 | 7 | 1 | ₹99.55 L | 1 | ₹25.00 L | 18.7 |
| 16 | BUDAUN | 1 | 1 | 1 | ₹1.25 Cr | 1 | ₹1.25 Cr | 48.7 |
| 17 | NEEMUCH | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹10.00 L | 1 | ₹10.00 L | 49.4 |
| 18 | CHANDAULI | 1 | 1 | 1 | ₹2.05 Cr | 1 | ₹2.05 Cr | 47.9 |
| 19 | SHAJAPUR | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹14.99 L | 1 | ₹14.99 L | 52.2 |
| 20 | SRINAGAR | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹50.00 L | 1 | ₹50.00 L | 40.3 |
| 21 | SHOPIAN | 32 | 31 | 1 | ₹87.33 L | 0 | ₹0 | 3.0 |
| 22 | SAMBA | 31 | 27 | 1 | ₹1.17 Cr | 0 | ₹0 | 8.5 |
| 23 | KULGAM | 26 | 26 | 1 | ₹78.37 L | 0 | ₹0 | 6.8 |
| 24 | REASI | 11 | 9 | 1 | ₹20.07 L | 0 | ₹0 | 9.6 |
Ordered by the share of allocation actually paid to vendors, lowest first — the members whose funds are moving slowest are the ones a nodal authority chases. “Committed” is money attached to a work but not yet paid; the portal publishes that figure under the name “utilisation”, which is why the two columns differ.
| Member | Allocated | Paid out | Committed | Never committed | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gurwinder Singh Oberoi Sitting Rajya Sabha | ₹7.35 Cr | 0.0% | 0.0% | ₹7.35 Cr | 0 |
| Sat Paul Sharma Sitting Rajya Sabha · 16 works | ₹7.35 Cr | 0.0% | 21.9% | ₹5.74 Cr | 5 |
| Chowdry Mohammad Ramzan Sitting Rajya Sabha · 2 works | ₹7.35 Cr | 0.0% | 3.5% | ₹7.09 Cr | 1 |
| Sajjad Ahmad Kichloo Sitting Rajya Sabha · 18 works | ₹7.35 Cr | 0.0% | 37.1% | ₹4.62 Cr | 3 |
| Jitendra Singh UDHAMPUR · 151 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 51.3% | 79.4% | ₹1.52 Cr | 9 |
| Jugal Kishore JAMMU · 111 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 59.6% | 75.6% | ₹1.80 Cr | 10 |
| Gulam Ali Nominated Rajya Sabha · 184 works | ₹19.61 Cr | 68.4% | 75.1% | ₹4.89 Cr | 16 |
| Hasnain Masoodi ANANTNAG · 354 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 73.5% | 82.7% | ₹1.69 Cr | 4 |
| Mohammad Akbar Lone BARAMULLAH · 213 works | ₹6.58 Cr | 81.6% | 100.0% | ₹313 | 6 |
Sector is read from each work’s own description, because the portal’s category column says “Normal/Others” on almost every row.
| Sector | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Street Lighting | 305 | ₹13.71 Cr | 11 |
| Roads & Paving | 204 | ₹6.44 Cr | 7 |
| Water | 111 | ₹3.42 Cr | 2 |
| Boundary & Protection | 91 | ₹2.43 Cr | 2 |
| Community Buildings | 82 | ₹7.29 Cr | 18 |
| Drainage & Sanitation | 82 | ₹2.73 Cr | 8 |
| Religious & Cultural | 49 | ₹2.03 Cr | 3 |
| Other | 34 | ₹1.61 Cr | 1 |
| Sports | 32 | ₹94.87 L | 1 |
| Equipment & Vehicles | 22 | ₹70.72 L | 0 |
Patterns across a whole agency or member, not a judgement on any one work — which is why none of these change a work’s score.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
Round figures are normal and similar works legitimately cost the same. One figure covering nearly every work is what this looks for, and it means the costing is worth seeing, not that it is wrong.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
The whole population fails the textbook test — the median agency scores 6.2 where Nigrini calls 1.5 nonconformant — because MPLADS amounts are capped, rounded and repeated by design. This ranks agencies against each other, not against the law. It is the weakest signal here and is never evidence on its own.
Round figures are normal and similar works legitimately cost the same. One figure covering nearly every work is what this looks for, and it means the costing is worth seeing, not that it is wrong.
Round figures are normal and similar works legitimately cost the same. One figure covering nearly every work is what this looks for, and it means the costing is worth seeing, not that it is wrong.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
The ten works least like their peers. A score is a reason to look, never a finding of wrongdoing.
| Work | District | Agency | Sanctioned | Score | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| construction of floor walls windows and doors of hall at sah ₹1,500,000 against a ₹522,883 median for Community Buildings works in JAMMU (187% above, 101 peer works) | JAMMU | JAMMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER JAMMU_IDA) | ₹15.00 L | 67.5 | MEDIUM |
| covering of open nallaah along side shorya smark park Unusual combination of sanctioned amount, delay and spending pattern — flagged by an isolation forest fitted over every work, not by any single figure being out of range | JAMMU | JAMMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER JAMMU_IDA) | ₹20.00 L | 62.8 | MEDIUM |
| Installation of Solar Street Lights Unusual combination of sanctioned amount, delay and spending pattern — flagged by an isolation forest fitted over every work, not by any single figure being out of range | ANANTNAG | ANANTNAG(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ANANTNAG_IDA) | ₹16,660 | 55.9 | MEDIUM |
| Construction for Extension/Enhancement of Community Hall (25 ₹1,500,000 against a ₹522,883 median for Community Buildings works in JAMMU (187% above, 101 peer works) | JAMMU | JAMMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER JAMMU_IDA) | ₹15.00 L | 53.6 | MEDIUM |
| Renovation of Hall (Building) at Gandhi Bhawan near Civil Se ₹2,000,000 against a ₹522,883 median for Community Buildings works in JAMMU (282% above, 101 peer works) | JAMMU | JAMMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER JAMMU_IDA) | ₹20.00 L | 53.6 | MEDIUM |
| CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD FROM BYE PASS TO NEW BUS ADDA VIA DEGRE ₹1,700,000 against a ₹229,250 median for Roads & Paving works in KUPWARA (642% above, 17 peer works) | KUPWARA | KUPWARA(Deputy Commissioner Kupwara_IDA) | ₹17.00 L | 53.4 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Toilet Complex/Bathroom at Village Neera nea ₹1,000,000 against a ₹300,000 median for Drainage & Sanitation works in RAMBAN (233% above, 17 peer works) | RAMBAN | RAMBAN(Deputy Commissioner Ramban_IDA) | ₹10.00 L | 53.2 | MEDIUM |
| Toilet Block at Neera ₹1,500,000 against a ₹300,000 median for Drainage & Sanitation works in RAMBAN (400% above, 17 peer works) | RAMBAN | RAMBAN(Deputy Commissioner Ramban_IDA) | ₹15.00 L | 53.2 | MEDIUM |
| Public tin shed ₹1,499,000 against a ₹500,000 median for Community Buildings works in SHAJAPUR (200% above, 63 peer works) | SHAJAPUR | SHAJAPUR(District Collector Shajapur_IDA) | ₹14.99 L | 52.2 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Community Shed, Village Gadena (Vermi), Bloc ₹7,244,000 against a ₹1,500,000 median for Community Buildings works in UDHAMPUR (383% above, 13 peer works) | UDHAMPUR | UDHAMPUR(Deputy Commissioner Udhampur_IDA) | ₹72.44 L | 52.1 | MEDIUM |