Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
11 works across 1 implementing agency, recommended by 1 member of parliament. No allocation figure is published per district — every rupee below is summed from the works themselves.
The people a district authority actually supervises. Vendor concentration is counted from the payment records: an agency paying almost everything to one vendor is worth a question, not an accusation.
| # | Agency | Works | Completed | Sanctioned | To verify | Avg score | Top vendor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | REASI(DC Reasi_2) | 11 | 9 | ₹20.07 L | 0 | 9.6 | Vikram Singh 22% of spend · 9 vendors |
Whose funds paid for this district’s works.
| Member | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jitendra Singh UDHAMPUR | 11 | ₹20.07 L | 0 |
Sector read from each work’s description.
| Sector | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roads & Paving | 4 | ₹7.07 L | 0 |
| Boundary & Protection | 2 | ₹3.91 L | 0 |
| Drainage & Sanitation | 2 | ₹3.84 L | 0 |
| Community Buildings | 1 | ₹1.57 L | 0 |
| Education | 1 | ₹1.97 L | 0 |
| Water | 1 | ₹1.72 L | 0 |
Ranked by score. Cost is judged against comparable works in this district and sector, so a high cost score means unlike its neighbours — not overpriced.