Kasauti can only be opened on a desktop or laptop.
Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
Ranked by how many works are waiting on verification, which is the queue a nodal authority actually has to clear. Open a district to see the agencies behind those works.
| # | District | Works | Completed | Agencies | Sanctioned | To verify | Flagged value | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JAMMU | 178 | 43 | 1 | ₹10.20 Cr | 20 | ₹2.36 Cr | 20.6 |
| 2 | KATHUA | 172 | 130 | 1 | ₹4.42 Cr | 14 | ₹66.96 L | 11.4 |
| 3 | RAMBAN | 50 | 16 | 1 | ₹2.02 Cr | 13 | ₹38.50 L | 23.0 |
| 4 | ANANTNAG | 63 | 6 | 1 | ₹4.88 Cr | 4 | ₹1.72 Cr | 9.8 |
| 5 | SHAHJAHANPUR | 139 | 139 | 1 | ₹7.92 Cr | 3 | ₹4.62 Cr | 24.7 |
| 6 | SRINAGAR | 87 | 30 | 1 | ₹3.64 Cr | 3 | ₹83.00 L | 15.4 |
| 7 | BUDGAM | 58 | 3 | 1 | ₹2.79 Cr | 3 | ₹36.07 L | 14.3 |
| 8 | PILIBHIT | 3 | 3 | 1 | ₹1.27 Cr | 3 | ₹1.27 Cr | 49.1 |
| 9 | DODA | 39 | 12 | 1 | ₹1.64 Cr | 2 | ₹7.00 L | 12.7 |
| 10 | KISHTWAR | 26 | 0 | 1 | ₹2.74 Cr | 2 | ₹1.06 Cr | 19.3 |
| 11 | UDHAMPUR | 64 | 30 | 1 | ₹2.62 Cr | 1 | ₹40.00 L | 11.6 |
| 12 | RAJOURI | 60 | 5 | 1 | ₹6.09 Cr | 1 | ₹25.00 L | 10.5 |
| 13 | KUPWARA | 52 | 19 | 1 | ₹3.14 Cr | 1 | ₹20.00 L | 11.5 |
| 14 | POONCH | 38 | 4 | 1 | ₹2.31 Cr | 1 | ₹16.00 L | 12.0 |
| 15 | SHAJAPUR | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹14.99 L | 1 | ₹14.99 L | 52.2 |
| 16 | NEEMUCH | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹10.00 L | 1 | ₹10.00 L | 50.2 |
| 17 | CHANDAULI | 1 | 1 | 1 | ₹2.05 Cr | 1 | ₹2.05 Cr | 47.9 |
| 18 | BUDAUN | 1 | 1 | 1 | ₹1.25 Cr | 1 | ₹1.25 Cr | 47.3 |
| 19 | BARAMULLA | 61 | 9 | 1 | ₹2.27 Cr | 0 | ₹0 | 8.8 |
| 20 | PULWAMA | 48 | 23 | 1 | ₹2.01 Cr | 0 | ₹0 | 11.7 |
| 21 | BANDIPORA | 40 | 14 | 1 | ₹94.52 L | 0 | ₹0 | 7.4 |
| 22 | SAMBA | 38 | 8 | 1 | ₹1.61 Cr | 0 | ₹0 | 7.7 |
| 23 | GANDERBAL | 12 | 4 | 1 | ₹1.46 Cr | 0 | ₹0 | 9.3 |
| 24 | SHOPIAN | 10 | 7 | 1 | ₹66.47 L | 0 | ₹0 | 10.6 |
| 25 | KULGAM | 4 | 0 | 1 | ₹97.00 L | 0 | ₹0 | 15.1 |
| 26 | REASI | 3 | 1 | 1 | ₹19.94 L | 0 | ₹0 | 4.6 |
Ordered by the share of allocation actually paid to vendors, lowest first — the members whose funds are moving slowest are the ones a nodal authority chases. “Committed” is money attached to a work but not yet paid; the portal publishes that figure under the name “utilisation”, which is why the two columns differ.
| Member | Allocated | Paid out | Committed | Never committed | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gurwinder Singh Oberoi Sitting Rajya Sabha | ₹7.35 Cr | 0.0% | 0.0% | ₹7.35 Cr | 0 |
| Sat Paul Sharma Sitting Rajya Sabha · 16 works | ₹7.35 Cr | 0.0% | 21.9% | ₹5.74 Cr | 5 |
| Chowdry Mohammad Ramzan Sitting Rajya Sabha · 2 works | ₹7.35 Cr | 0.0% | 3.5% | ₹7.09 Cr | 1 |
| Sajjad Ahmad Kichloo Sitting Rajya Sabha · 18 works | ₹7.35 Cr | 0.0% | 37.1% | ₹4.62 Cr | 3 |
| Aga Syed Ruhullah Mehdi SRINAGAR · 198 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 14.2% | 62.6% | ₹5.50 Cr | 3 |
| Mian Altaf Ahmad ANANTNAG · 133 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 16.7% | 92.8% | ₹1.06 Cr | 5 |
| Abdul Rashid Sheikh BARAMULLAH · 162 works | ₹15.48 Cr | 17.9% | 44.3% | ₹8.62 Cr | 2 |
| Jugal Kishore JAMMU · 210 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 20.9% | 75.5% | ₹3.60 Cr | 13 |
| Jitendra Singh UDHAMPUR · 326 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 32.9% | 70.0% | ₹4.40 Cr | 27 |
| Gulam Ali Nominated Rajya Sabha · 184 works | ₹19.61 Cr | 68.4% | 75.1% | ₹4.89 Cr | 16 |
Sector is read from each work’s own description, because the portal’s category column says “Normal/Others” on almost every row.
| Sector | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roads & Paving | 241 | ₹8.91 Cr | 21 |
| Water | 198 | ₹8.97 Cr | 3 |
| Street Lighting | 180 | ₹15.36 Cr | 13 |
| Drainage & Sanitation | 145 | ₹3.82 Cr | 12 |
| Boundary & Protection | 125 | ₹3.44 Cr | 5 |
| Community Buildings | 117 | ₹9.31 Cr | 12 |
| Sports | 65 | ₹2.52 Cr | 1 |
| Religious & Cultural | 60 | ₹2.78 Cr | 2 |
| Education | 39 | ₹2.58 Cr | 2 |
| Health | 35 | ₹8.48 Cr | 2 |
Patterns across a whole agency or member, not a judgement on any one work — which is why none of these change a work’s score.
Round figures are normal and similar works legitimately cost the same. One figure covering nearly every work is what this looks for, and it means the costing is worth seeing, not that it is wrong.
Round figures are normal and similar works legitimately cost the same. One figure covering nearly every work is what this looks for, and it means the costing is worth seeing, not that it is wrong.
Round figures are normal and similar works legitimately cost the same. One figure covering nearly every work is what this looks for, and it means the costing is worth seeing, not that it is wrong.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
The whole population fails the textbook test — the median agency scores 6.2 where Nigrini calls 1.5 nonconformant — because MPLADS amounts are capped, rounded and repeated by design. This ranks agencies against each other, not against the law. It is the weakest signal here and is never evidence on its own.
The whole population fails the textbook test — the median agency scores 6.2 where Nigrini calls 1.5 nonconformant — because MPLADS amounts are capped, rounded and repeated by design. This ranks agencies against each other, not against the law. It is the weakest signal here and is never evidence on its own.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
The ten works least like their peers. A score is a reason to look, never a finding of wrongdoing.
| Work | District | Agency | Sanctioned | Score | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| construction of floor walls windows and doors of hall at sah ₹1,500,000 against a ₹522,883 median for Community Buildings works in JAMMU (187% above, 101 peer works) | JAMMU | JAMMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER JAMMU_IDA) | ₹15.00 L | 67.5 | MEDIUM |
| covering of open nallaah along side shorya smark park Unusual combination of sanctioned amount, delay and spending pattern — flagged by an isolation forest fitted over every work, not by any single figure being out of range | JAMMU | JAMMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER JAMMU_IDA) | ₹20.00 L | 62.8 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Lane with Laying and Fixing of Tiles at Moha ₹500,000 against a ₹200,000 median for Roads & Paving works in JAMMU (150% above, 65 peer works) | JAMMU | JAMMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER JAMMU_IDA) | ₹5.00 L | 59.9 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Protection Wall near house to Sh. Parkash S ₹300,000 against a ₹163,000 median for Boundary & Protection works in RAMBAN (84% above, 17 peer works) | RAMBAN | RAMBAN(Deputy Commissioner Ramban_IDA) | ₹3.00 L | 56.8 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Tile Work ₹400,000 against a ₹200,000 median for Roads & Paving works in RAMBAN (100% above, 19 peer works) | RAMBAN | RAMBAN(Deputy Commissioner Ramban_IDA) | ₹4.00 L | 55.8 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Tile Work ₹400,000 against a ₹200,000 median for Roads & Paving works in RAMBAN (100% above, 19 peer works) | RAMBAN | RAMBAN(Deputy Commissioner Ramban_IDA) | ₹4.00 L | 55.8 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Culvert for Mohalla Khaldian Ward no 01 vill ₹500,000 against a ₹200,000 median for Roads & Paving works in JAMMU (150% above, 65 peer works) | JAMMU | JAMMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER JAMMU_IDA) | ₹5.00 L | 53.6 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Lane with Tile Work from Main road to Rama S ₹400,000 against a ₹200,000 median for Roads & Paving works in JAMMU (100% above, 65 peer works) | JAMMU | JAMMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER JAMMU_IDA) | ₹4.00 L | 53.6 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Community Hall at Bandhurakh Ward No. 68 (Pa ₹3,000,000 against a ₹522,883 median for Community Buildings works in JAMMU (474% above, 101 peer works) | JAMMU | JAMMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER JAMMU_IDA) | ₹30.00 L | 53.6 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Laboratory Building and setting up of labora ₹2,500,000 against a ₹990,933 median for Education works in JAMMU (152% above, 9 peer works) | JAMMU | JAMMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER JAMMU_IDA) | ₹25.00 L | 53.3 | MEDIUM |
