Kasauti can only be opened on a desktop or laptop.
Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
Ranked by how many works are waiting on verification, which is the queue a nodal authority actually has to clear. Open a district to see the agencies behind those works.
| # | District | Works | Completed | Agencies | Sanctioned | To verify | Flagged value | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HISAR 3 high risk | 413 | 57 | 1 | ₹14.74 Cr | 98 | ₹6.04 Cr | 27.4 |
| 2 | YAMUNANAGAR | 87 | 0 | 1 | ₹5.25 Cr | 38 | ₹2.81 Cr | 35.1 |
| 3 | FATEHABAD | 143 | 20 | 1 | ₹9.15 Cr | 30 | ₹4.49 Cr | 18.8 |
| 4 | PANCHKULA | 181 | 2 | 1 | ₹13.30 Cr | 29 | ₹3.90 Cr | 30.1 |
| 5 | AMBALA | 95 | 2 | 1 | ₹7.48 Cr | 16 | ₹1.84 Cr | 24.0 |
| 6 | JIND 1 high risk | 202 | 23 | 1 | ₹9.89 Cr | 13 | ₹1.57 Cr | 18.5 |
| 7 | KURUKSHETRA | 106 | 76 | 1 | ₹4.46 Cr | 11 | ₹1.27 Cr | 14.5 |
| 8 | SONIPAT | 99 | 2 | 1 | ₹6.36 Cr | 10 | ₹82.34 L | 21.9 |
| 9 | BHIWANI | 126 | 49 | 1 | ₹5.11 Cr | 8 | ₹67.99 L | 19.8 |
| 10 | JHAJJAR | 88 | 28 | 1 | ₹5.88 Cr | 8 | ₹85.00 L | 19.0 |
| 11 | SIRSA | 199 | 39 | 1 | ₹6.20 Cr | 7 | ₹68.25 L | 9.6 |
| 12 | ROHTAK | 81 | 39 | 1 | ₹5.73 Cr | 7 | ₹98.50 L | 16.4 |
| 13 | GURUGRAM | 15 | 1 | 1 | ₹1.62 Cr | 6 | ₹73.85 L | 38.0 |
| 14 | KAITHAL | 67 | 41 | 1 | ₹2.80 Cr | 5 | ₹40.96 L | 20.9 |
| 15 | REWARI 1 high risk | 39 | 17 | 1 | ₹3.90 Cr | 4 | ₹69.00 L | 21.4 |
| 16 | PANIPAT | 20 | 1 | 1 | ₹3.16 Cr | 3 | ₹74.69 L | 22.6 |
| 17 | FARIDABAD | 29 | 4 | 1 | ₹2.69 Cr | 2 | ₹32.00 L | 18.6 |
| 18 | VARANASI | 2 | 1 | 1 | ₹14.60 L | 2 | ₹14.60 L | 46.2 |
| 19 | CHARKHI DADRI | 44 | 24 | 1 | ₹1.79 Cr | 1 | ₹15.00 L | 20.9 |
| 20 | CHURU 1 high risk | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹21.49 L | 1 | ₹21.49 L | 74.0 |
| 21 | JAIPUR | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹21.00 L | 1 | ₹21.00 L | 47.2 |
| 22 | THANE | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹21.00 L | 1 | ₹21.00 L | 47.4 |
| 23 | MAHENDRAGARH | 68 | 38 | 1 | ₹3.57 Cr | 0 | ₹0 | 16.6 |
| 24 | PALWAL | 52 | 2 | 1 | ₹3.94 Cr | 0 | ₹0 | 17.4 |
| 25 | CHANDIGARH | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹25.00 L | 0 | ₹0 | 27.2 |
| 26 | NUH | 1 | 1 | 1 | ₹1.92 L | 0 | ₹0 | 4.9 |
| 27 | KARNAL | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹10.00 L | 0 | ₹0 | 24.9 |
Ordered by the share of allocation actually paid to vendors, lowest first — the members whose funds are moving slowest are the ones a nodal authority chases. “Committed” is money attached to a work but not yet paid; the portal publishes that figure under the name “utilisation”, which is why the two columns differ.
| Member | Allocated | Paid out | Committed | Never committed | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sanjay Bhatia Sitting Rajya Sabha · 1 works | ₹4.90 Cr | 0.0% | 2.2% | ₹4.79 Cr | 1 |
| Karamvir Singh Boudh Sitting Rajya Sabha | ₹4.90 Cr | 0.0% | 0.0% | ₹4.90 Cr | 0 |
| Kartikeya Sharma Sitting Rajya Sabha · 62 works | ₹19.60 Cr | 0.6% | 31.2% | ₹13.48 Cr | 6 |
| Manohar Lal KARNAL · 19 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 11.3% | 20.8% | ₹11.65 Cr | 2 |
| Varun Chaudhry AMBALA · 157 works | ₹25.55 Cr | 11.6% | 49.3% | ₹12.96 Cr | 43 |
| Rekha Sharma Sitting Rajya Sabha · 145 works | ₹9.80 Cr | 14.5% | 80.0% | ₹1.96 Cr | 26 |
| Rao Inderjit Singh GURGAON · 47 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 15.4% | 32.6% | ₹9.91 Cr | 8 |
| Krishan Pal Gurjar FARIDABAD · 81 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 16.9% | 46.2% | ₹7.91 Cr | 3 |
| Kumari Selja SIRSA · 312 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 18.1% | 71.3% | ₹4.23 Cr | 4 |
| Subhash Barala Sitting Rajya Sabha · 84 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 20.1% | 62.7% | ₹5.49 Cr | 51 |
| Satpal Brahamchari SONEPAT · 226 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 24.4% | 88.3% | ₹1.72 Cr | 17 |
| Deepender Singh Hooda ROHTAK · 177 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 40.2% | 82.3% | ₹2.61 Cr | 15 |
| Naveen Jindal KURUKSHETRA · 201 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 41.7% | 56.4% | ₹6.41 Cr | 33 |
| Dharambir Singh BHIWANI MAHENDRAGARH · 206 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 45.0% | 62.9% | ₹5.45 Cr | 11 |
| Jai Parkash HISAR · 444 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 49.8% | 99.6% | ₹6.47 L | 81 |
Sector is read from each work’s own description, because the portal’s category column says “Normal/Others” on almost every row.
| Sector | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Community Buildings | 544 | ₹39.29 Cr | 108 |
| Water | 487 | ₹11.28 Cr | 63 |
| Roads & Paving | 325 | ₹21.11 Cr | 44 |
| Street Lighting | 201 | ₹7.64 Cr | 7 |
| Education | 120 | ₹10.10 Cr | 25 |
| Drainage & Sanitation | 107 | ₹5.40 Cr | 10 |
| Sports | 88 | ₹4.60 Cr | 13 |
| Other | 86 | ₹2.91 Cr | 9 |
| Equipment & Vehicles | 69 | ₹4.75 Cr | 6 |
| Religious & Cultural | 59 | ₹4.02 Cr | 9 |
Patterns across a whole agency or member, not a judgement on any one work — which is why none of these change a work’s score.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
The ten works least like their peers. A score is a reason to look, never a finding of wrongdoing.
| Work | District | Agency | Sanctioned | Score | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Construction Cows Shed, wall and drinking water ₹2,089,839 against a ₹155,000 median for Water works in HISAR (1248% above, 347 peer works) | HISAR | HISAR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HISSAR_IDA) | ₹20.90 L | 75.6 | HIGH |
| Construction of Interlocking Tiles for cows in the Gaushala, ₹1,098,814 against a ₹199,276 median for Roads & Paving works in HISAR (451% above, 50 peer works) | HISAR | HISAR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HISSAR_IDA) | ₹10.99 L | 75.6 | HIGH |
| Construction of RO System (500-100 Lph) Including Water Cool ₹1,100,000 against a ₹175,000 median for Water works in JIND (529% above, 156 peer works) | JIND | JIND(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER JIND) | ₹11.00 L | 75.6 | HIGH |
| Installation of AC unit plant for Litigant Main Hall in Dist ₹1,100,000 against a ₹536,300 median for Community Buildings works in HISAR (105% above, 89 peer works) | HISAR | HISAR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HISSAR_IDA) | ₹11.00 L | 75.6 | HIGH |
| Pipeline and Public Stand Post (PSP) from Mundi Tal to Amarp ₹2,149,000 against a ₹400,000 median for Water works in CHURU (437% above, 13 peer works) | CHURU | CHURU(DISTRICT COLLECTOR CHURU_IDA) | ₹21.49 L | 74.0 | HIGH |
| Construction and repair of boundry wall, repair and renovati ₹2,500,000 against a ₹997,376 median for Boundary & Protection works in REWARI (151% above, 12 peer works) | REWARI | REWARI(District Commissioner Rewari) | ₹25.00 L | 72.6 | HIGH |
| Const. of General Chaupal ₹999,648 against a ₹500,000 median for Community Buildings works in JIND (100% above, 87 peer works) | JIND | JIND(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER JIND) | ₹10.00 L | 69.9 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Cycle Stand, Painting of School, and Ro Wate ₹497,024 against a ₹175,000 median for Water works in JIND (184% above, 156 peer works) | JIND | JIND(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER JIND) | ₹4.97 L | 67.1 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Hall ₹1,200,000 against a ₹525,000 median for Community Buildings works in YAMUNANAGAR (129% above, 55 peer works) | YAMUNANAGAR | YAMUNANAGAR(Deputy Commissioner YamunaNagar_IDA) | ₹12.00 L | 66.1 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Shed for cows in the Gaushala, Village Balak ₹1,100,000 against a ₹536,300 median for Community Buildings works in HISAR (105% above, 89 peer works) | HISAR | HISAR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HISSAR_IDA) | ₹11.00 L | 65.8 | MEDIUM |
