Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
Ranked by how many works are waiting on verification, which is the queue a nodal authority actually has to clear. Open a district to see the agencies behind those works.
| # | District | Works | Completed | Agencies | Sanctioned | To verify | Flagged value | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JIND 1 high risk | 167 | 47 | 1 | ₹6.20 Cr | 90 | ₹3.56 Cr | 35.4 |
| 2 | PALWAL | 89 | 9 | 1 | ₹7.72 Cr | 79 | ₹7.19 Cr | 43.1 |
| 3 | HISAR 2 high risk | 249 | 124 | 1 | ₹7.97 Cr | 76 | ₹4.00 Cr | 29.3 |
| 4 | FATEHABAD | 143 | 57 | 1 | ₹8.88 Cr | 39 | ₹4.35 Cr | 30.5 |
| 5 | PANIPAT 1 high risk | 55 | 20 | 1 | ₹4.38 Cr | 34 | ₹2.97 Cr | 37.2 |
| 6 | PANCHKULA | 153 | 1 | 1 | ₹10.78 Cr | 24 | ₹3.19 Cr | 31.7 |
| 7 | GURUGRAM | 42 | 19 | 1 | ₹3.11 Cr | 23 | ₹1.88 Cr | 33.2 |
| 8 | YAMUNANAGAR | 33 | 1 | 1 | ₹1.46 Cr | 22 | ₹1.12 Cr | 38.3 |
| 9 | SONIPAT | 82 | 59 | 1 | ₹4.08 Cr | 16 | ₹1.49 Cr | 20.6 |
| 10 | BHIWANI | 104 | 92 | 1 | ₹3.76 Cr | 12 | ₹79.86 L | 22.2 |
| 11 | KAITHAL | 54 | 24 | 1 | ₹2.85 Cr | 11 | ₹99.16 L | 28.1 |
| 12 | SIRSA | 80 | 46 | 1 | ₹2.83 Cr | 8 | ₹50.40 L | 22.2 |
| 13 | KARNAL | 87 | 74 | 1 | ₹6.81 Cr | 7 | ₹1.37 Cr | 18.6 |
| 14 | REWARI 1 high risk | 87 | 71 | 1 | ₹5.99 Cr | 7 | ₹1.01 Cr | 14.7 |
| 15 | ROHTAK | 77 | 47 | 1 | ₹4.48 Cr | 7 | ₹71.53 L | 23.0 |
| 16 | JHAJJAR | 87 | 68 | 1 | ₹5.03 Cr | 6 | ₹45.07 L | 16.6 |
| 17 | CHARKHI DADRI 1 high risk | 15 | 10 | 1 | ₹63.95 L | 5 | ₹39.00 L | 34.1 |
| 18 | FARIDABAD | 65 | 51 | 1 | ₹3.73 Cr | 3 | ₹33.81 L | 17.9 |
| 19 | NUH | 11 | 8 | 1 | ₹97.28 L | 3 | ₹28.78 L | 19.0 |
| 20 | KURUKSHETRA | 48 | 43 | 1 | ₹2.47 Cr | 1 | ₹8.00 L | 14.9 |
| 21 | MAHENDRAGARH | 40 | 39 | 1 | ₹1.61 Cr | 1 | ₹2.37 L | 19.9 |
| 22 | CHURU 1 high risk | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹21.49 L | 1 | ₹21.49 L | 74.0 |
| 23 | AMBALA | 16 | 0 | 1 | ₹1.80 Cr | 0 | ₹0 | 27.6 |
Ordered by the share of allocation actually paid to vendors, lowest first — the members whose funds are moving slowest are the ones a nodal authority chases. “Committed” is money attached to a work but not yet paid; the portal publishes that figure under the name “utilisation”, which is why the two columns differ.
| Member | Allocated | Paid out | Committed | Never committed | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rattan Lal Kataria AMBALA | ₹0 | — | 0.0% | ₹0 | 0 |
| Karamvir Singh Boudh Sitting Rajya Sabha | ₹4.90 Cr | 0.0% | 0.0% | ₹4.90 Cr | 0 |
| Sanjay Bhatia Sitting Rajya Sabha · 1 works | ₹4.90 Cr | 0.0% | 2.2% | ₹4.79 Cr | 1 |
| Kartikeya Sharma Sitting Rajya Sabha · 62 works | ₹19.60 Cr | 0.6% | 31.2% | ₹13.48 Cr | 4 |
| Rekha Sharma Sitting Rajya Sabha · 145 works | ₹9.80 Cr | 14.5% | 80.0% | ₹1.96 Cr | 26 |
| Subhash Barala Sitting Rajya Sabha · 84 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 20.1% | 62.7% | ₹5.49 Cr | 51 |
| Krishan Pal Gurjar FARIDABAD · 153 works | ₹11.77 Cr | 65.3% | 96.9% | ₹36.89 L | 82 |
| Arvind Kumar Sharma ROHTAK · 178 works | ₹11.77 Cr | 68.7% | 89.4% | ₹1.24 Cr | 12 |
| Sunita Duggal SIRSA · 198 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 69.9% | 95.3% | ₹34.57 L | 31 |
| Rao Inderjit Singh GURGAON · 123 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 70.4% | 92.3% | ₹75.48 L | 31 |
| Ramesh Chander Kaushik SONEPAT · 133 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 71.4% | 91.5% | ₹62.34 L | 58 |
| Nayab Singh KURUKSHETRA · 123 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 73.3% | 87.9% | ₹88.98 L | 33 |
| Brijendra Singh HISAR · 333 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 78.1% | 93.4% | ₹64.97 L | 92 |
| Sanjay Bhatia KARNAL · 140 works | ₹11.77 Cr | 79.6% | 94.4% | ₹65.40 L | 40 |
| Dharambir Singh BHIWANI MAHENDRAGARH · 112 works | ₹4.91 Cr | 81.7% | 90.1% | ₹48.70 L | 14 |
Sector is read from each work’s own description, because the portal’s category column says “Normal/Others” on almost every row.
| Sector | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Community Buildings | 427 | ₹27.24 Cr | 116 |
| Water | 386 | ₹8.98 Cr | 110 |
| Roads & Paving | 320 | ₹21.12 Cr | 105 |
| Education | 157 | ₹9.71 Cr | 58 |
| Drainage & Sanitation | 101 | ₹4.46 Cr | 15 |
| Street Lighting | 97 | ₹4.18 Cr | 8 |
| Religious & Cultural | 69 | ₹4.37 Cr | 19 |
| Sports | 67 | ₹2.72 Cr | 12 |
| Equipment & Vehicles | 57 | ₹6.86 Cr | 12 |
| Health | 37 | ₹3.97 Cr | 6 |
Patterns across a whole agency or member, not a judgement on any one work — which is why none of these change a work’s score.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
Round figures are normal and similar works legitimately cost the same. One figure covering nearly every work is what this looks for, and it means the costing is worth seeing, not that it is wrong.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
The ten works least like their peers. A score is a reason to look, never a finding of wrongdoing.
| Work | District | Agency | Sanctioned | Score | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Construction Cows Shed, wall and drinking water ₹2,089,839 against a ₹155,000 median for Water works in HISAR (1248% above, 347 peer works) | HISAR | HISAR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HISSAR_IDA) | ₹20.90 L | 75.6 | HIGH |
| Construction of Interlocking Tiles for cows in the Gaushala, ₹1,098,814 against a ₹199,276 median for Roads & Paving works in HISAR (451% above, 50 peer works) | HISAR | HISAR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HISSAR_IDA) | ₹10.99 L | 75.6 | HIGH |
| Construction of RO System (500-100 Lph) Including Water Cool ₹1,100,000 against a ₹175,000 median for Water works in JIND (529% above, 156 peer works) | JIND | JIND(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER JIND) | ₹11.00 L | 75.6 | HIGH |
| Pipeline and Public Stand Post (PSP) from Mundi Tal to Amarp ₹2,149,000 against a ₹400,000 median for Water works in CHURU (437% above, 13 peer works) | CHURU | CHURU(DISTRICT COLLECTOR CHURU_IDA) | ₹21.49 L | 74.0 | HIGH |
| Providing Garbage Collection and Disposal Systems (100 nos. Unusual combination of sanctioned amount, delay and spending pattern — flagged by an isolation forest fitted over every work, not by any single figure being out of range | PANIPAT | PANIPAT(DC CUM NODAL OFFICER MPLADS) | ₹42.81 L | 73.0 | HIGH |
| Renovation, repair & other construction work of Shri Bhagwat ₹2,500,000 against a ₹800,000 median for Religious & Cultural works in REWARI (212% above, 10 peer works) | REWARI | REWARI(District Commissioner Rewari) | ₹25.00 L | 72.6 | HIGH |
| Construction of Bhagwan Parshuram Sabhagar Unusual combination of sanctioned amount, delay and spending pattern — flagged by an isolation forest fitted over every work, not by any single figure being out of range | CHARKHI DADRI | Charkhi Dadri(Deputy Commissioner Charkhi Dadri_IDA) | ₹15.00 L | 72.4 | HIGH |
| Providing Garbage Collection and Disposal Systems (100 nos. Unusual combination of sanctioned amount, delay and spending pattern — flagged by an isolation forest fitted over every work, not by any single figure being out of range | PANIPAT | PANIPAT(DC CUM NODAL OFFICER MPLADS) | ₹17.90 L | 69.1 | MEDIUM |
| Providing Garbage Collection and Disposal Systems (100 nos. Unusual combination of sanctioned amount, delay and spending pattern — flagged by an isolation forest fitted over every work, not by any single figure being out of range | PANIPAT | PANIPAT(DC CUM NODAL OFFICER MPLADS) | ₹15.14 L | 67.5 | MEDIUM |
| Providing Garbage Collection and Disposal Systems (100 nos. Unusual combination of sanctioned amount, delay and spending pattern — flagged by an isolation forest fitted over every work, not by any single figure being out of range | PANIPAT | PANIPAT(DC CUM NODAL OFFICER MPLADS) | ₹14.54 L | 67.1 | MEDIUM |