Kasauti can only be opened on a desktop or laptop.
Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
Ranked by how many works are waiting on verification, which is the queue a nodal authority actually has to clear. Open a district to see the agencies behind those works.
| # | District | Works | Completed | Agencies | Sanctioned | To verify | Flagged value | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PRAKASAM 1 high risk | 405 | 226 | 1 | ₹22.12 Cr | 74 | ₹5.87 Cr | 27.1 |
| 2 | ANNAMAYYA 3 high risk | 365 | 229 | 1 | ₹14.71 Cr | 67 | ₹5.16 Cr | 25.2 |
| 3 | VIZIANAGARAM | 246 | 152 | 1 | ₹9.69 Cr | 67 | ₹3.48 Cr | 23.2 |
| 4 | Y.S.R. KADAPA 1 high risk | 292 | 177 | 1 | ₹24.12 Cr | 56 | ₹10.49 Cr | 25.9 |
| 5 | PALNADU | 125 | 73 | 1 | ₹10.46 Cr | 38 | ₹5.00 Cr | 26.4 |
| 6 | CHITTOOR | 182 | 135 | 1 | ₹11.42 Cr | 32 | ₹3.92 Cr | 22.7 |
| 7 | SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE | 221 | 145 | 1 | ₹21.56 Cr | 29 | ₹6.38 Cr | 23.4 |
| 8 | SRIKAKULAM | 182 | 126 | 1 | ₹8.92 Cr | 23 | ₹1.65 Cr | 18.3 |
| 9 | ELURU 1 high risk | 77 | 39 | 1 | ₹7.94 Cr | 23 | ₹3.71 Cr | 29.5 |
| 10 | NARAYANPET | 65 | 13 | 1 | ₹5.43 Cr | 23 | ₹3.58 Cr | 34.7 |
| 11 | VISAKHAPATNAM 1 high risk | 59 | 27 | 1 | ₹12.25 Cr | 22 | ₹6.88 Cr | 32.9 |
| 12 | WEST GODAVARI | 127 | 89 | 1 | ₹13.32 Cr | 20 | ₹4.69 Cr | 21.9 |
| 13 | NTR | 122 | 92 | 1 | ₹11.14 Cr | 18 | ₹4.54 Cr | 15.6 |
| 14 | SRI SATHYA SAI | 96 | 81 | 1 | ₹8.28 Cr | 17 | ₹1.72 Cr | 28.5 |
| 15 | KRISHNA | 98 | 77 | 1 | ₹8.44 Cr | 16 | ₹2.84 Cr | 20.3 |
| 16 | ALLURI SITHARAMA RAJU | 136 | 106 | 1 | ₹6.30 Cr | 12 | ₹1.47 Cr | 17.4 |
| 17 | PARVATHIPURAM MANYAM | 56 | 32 | 1 | ₹4.34 Cr | 12 | ₹78.75 L | 29.6 |
| 18 | DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA 1 high risk | 213 | 188 | 1 | ₹13.26 Cr | 10 | ₹1.90 Cr | 10.2 |
| 19 | BAPATLA | 132 | 116 | 1 | ₹10.91 Cr | 10 | ₹2.51 Cr | 13.3 |
| 20 | KURNOOL | 362 | 353 | 1 | ₹12.73 Cr | 9 | ₹2.00 Cr | 9.4 |
| 21 | EAST GODAVARI 2 high risk | 21 | 12 | 1 | ₹11.66 Cr | 9 | ₹4.29 Cr | 43.8 |
| 22 | ANANTHAPURAMU | 196 | 171 | 1 | ₹13.14 Cr | 8 | ₹2.25 Cr | 13.0 |
| 23 | GUNTUR | 154 | 135 | 1 | ₹12.67 Cr | 8 | ₹2.36 Cr | 16.1 |
| 24 | TIRUPATI | 107 | 74 | 1 | ₹7.77 Cr | 8 | ₹72.80 L | 22.1 |
| 25 | ANAKAPALLI | 90 | 76 | 1 | ₹9.65 Cr | 8 | ₹1.09 Cr | 21.9 |
| 26 | ADILABAD | 8 | 0 | 1 | ₹50.00 L | 5 | ₹40.60 L | 43.9 |
| 27 | KAKINADA | 140 | 128 | 1 | ₹7.41 Cr | 3 | ₹22.38 L | 8.5 |
| 28 | NANDYAL | 145 | 137 | 1 | ₹7.92 Cr | 1 | ₹15.61 L | 9.4 |
| 29 | SIDDIPET | 7 | 2 | 1 | ₹44.94 L | 1 | ₹15.00 L | 28.1 |
| 30 | MAHABUBNAGAR | 5 | 4 | 1 | ₹12.50 L | 1 | ₹2.50 L | 34.2 |
| 31 | EAST KHASI HILLS | 2 | 1 | 1 | ₹50.00 L | 1 | ₹25.00 L | 39.7 |
| 32 | YADADRI BHUVANAGIRI | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹10.00 L | 1 | ₹10.00 L | 46.2 |
| 33 | VIKARABAD | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹25.00 L | 1 | ₹25.00 L | 63.0 |
| 34 | HANUMAKONDA 1 high risk | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹50.00 L | 1 | ₹50.00 L | 81.8 |
| 35 | GORAKHPUR | 1 | 1 | 1 | ₹24.96 L | 1 | ₹24.96 L | 46.1 |
| 36 | NIZAMABAD | 35 | 34 | 1 | ₹56.00 L | 0 | ₹0 | 28.9 |
| 37 | NALGONDA | 33 | 0 | 1 | ₹1.65 Cr | 0 | ₹0 | 26.5 |
| 38 | NIRMAL | 2 | 0 | 1 | ₹50.00 L | 0 | ₹0 | 34.9 |
| 39 | RANGA REDDY | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹2.00 L | 0 | ₹0 | 35.0 |
Ordered by the share of allocation actually paid to vendors, lowest first — the members whose funds are moving slowest are the ones a nodal authority chases. “Committed” is money attached to a work but not yet paid; the portal publishes that figure under the name “utilisation”, which is why the two columns differ.
| Member | Allocated | Paid out | Committed | Never committed | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lingamaneni Ramesh Sitting Rajya Sabha · 1 works | ₹4.90 Cr | 0.0% | 2.5% | ₹4.78 Cr | 1 |
| Bhashyam Rama Krishna Sitting Rajya Sabha · 1 works | ₹4.90 Cr | 0.0% | 6.1% | ₹4.60 Cr | 1 |
| Sana Sathish Babu Sitting Rajya Sabha | ₹4.91 Cr | 0.0% | 0.0% | ₹4.91 Cr | 0 |
| Vijay Chintakayala Sitting Rajya Sabha | ₹4.90 Cr | 0.0% | 0.0% | ₹4.90 Cr | 0 |
| Paka Venkata Satyanarayana Sitting Rajya Sabha · 17 works | ₹9.80 Cr | 1.6% | 45.4% | ₹5.35 Cr | 13 |
| S Niranjan Reddy Sitting Rajya Sabha · 19 works | ₹22.46 Cr | 13.1% | 28.0% | ₹16.18 Cr | 13 |
| Golla Baburao Sitting Rajya Sabha · 43 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 13.8% | 26.2% | ₹10.85 Cr | 15 |
| Masthan Rao Yadav Beedha Sitting Rajya Sabha · 120 works | ₹17.13 Cr | 20.7% | 79.6% | ₹3.49 Cr | 28 |
| Yerram Venkata Subba Reddy Sitting Rajya Sabha · 142 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 22.6% | 72.2% | ₹4.09 Cr | 62 |
| Ryaga Krishnaiah Sitting Rajya Sabha · 69 works | ₹17.04 Cr | 35.8% | 87.5% | ₹2.14 Cr | 46 |
| Kotagiri Sridhar ELURU · 75 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 39.6% | 75.7% | ₹2.39 Cr | 21 |
| V. Vijayendra Prasad Nominated Rajya Sabha · 195 works | ₹19.61 Cr | 46.3% | 85.4% | ₹2.87 Cr | 53 |
| M V V Satyanarayana VISAKHAPATNAM · 55 works | ₹10.45 Cr | 49.2% | 91.3% | ₹90.92 L | 16 |
| Chandra Sekhar Bellana VIZIANAGARAM · 261 works | ₹11.24 Cr | 53.2% | 79.0% | ₹2.36 Cr | 76 |
| Meda Raghunadha Reddy Sitting Rajya Sabha · 249 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 55.4% | 98.6% | ₹20.29 L | 64 |
| Raghu Ramakrishna Raju Kanumuru NARASAPURAM · 104 works | ₹11.79 Cr | 59.5% | 68.3% | ₹3.73 Cr | 3 |
| Balashowry Vallabhaneni MACHILIPATNAM · 94 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 62.2% | 78.2% | ₹2.14 Cr | 11 |
| Magunta Sreenivasulu Reddy ONGOLE · 347 works | ₹19.12 Cr | 64.5% | 95.9% | ₹77.91 L | 42 |
| Lavu Sri Krishna Devarayalu NARASARAOPET · 110 works | ₹8.00 Cr | 68.2% | 98.3% | ₹13.50 L | 28 |
| P V Midhun Reddy RAJAMPET · 268 works | ₹9.92 Cr | 71.3% | 96.5% | ₹34.63 L | 16 |
| Maddila Gurumoorthy TIRUPATI · 100 works | ₹9.39 Cr | 72.3% | 86.1% | ₹1.31 Cr | 7 |
| Srinivas Kesineni VIJAYAWADA · 93 works | ₹7.67 Cr | 73.8% | 73.8% | ₹2.01 Cr | 2 |
| Pocha Brahmananda Reddy NANDYAL · 137 works | ₹9.44 Cr | 77.5% | 77.5% | ₹2.13 Cr | 0 |
| Y S Avinash Reddy KADAPA · 133 works | ₹10.08 Cr | 78.1% | 93.6% | ₹64.90 L | 16 |
| Adala Prabhakara Reddy NELLORE · 90 works | ₹11.77 Cr | 78.6% | 78.6% | ₹2.52 Cr | 0 |
| Kinjarapu Rammohan Naidu SRIKAKULAM · 132 works | ₹7.23 Cr | 78.6% | 98.4% | ₹11.37 L | 8 |
| Goddeti Madhavi ARAKU · 190 works | ₹9.80 Cr | 78.9% | 100.0% | ₹38,594 | 22 |
| Kuruva Gorantla Madhav HINDUPUR · 64 works | ₹7.23 Cr | 79.9% | 84.7% | ₹1.11 Cr | 2 |
| Reddeppa Nallakonda Gari CHITTOOR · 163 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 80.7% | 97.1% | ₹28.57 L | 25 |
| Talari Rangaiah ANANTAPUR · 201 works | ₹13.48 Cr | 81.3% | 98.0% | ₹27.32 L | 11 |
| Bharat Ram Margani RAJAHMUNDRY · 15 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 82.3% | 99.9% | ₹63,957.11 | 4 |
| Chinta Anuradha AMALAPURAM · 193 works | ₹11.77 Cr | 85.6% | 97.9% | ₹24.75 L | 8 |
| Sanjeev Kumar Singari KURNOOL · 365 works | ₹11.47 Cr | 88.9% | 90.3% | ₹1.11 Cr | 11 |
| Venkata Satyavathi Beesetti ANAKAPALLE · 69 works | ₹9.20 Cr | 89.5% | 97.2% | ₹26.00 L | 3 |
| Nandigam Suresh BAPATLA · 122 works | ₹9.14 Cr | 93.0% | 95.0% | ₹45.32 L | 2 |
| Jayadev Galla GUNTUR · 145 works | ₹10.71 Cr | 95.8% | 99.5% | ₹5.07 L | 4 |
| Geetha Viswanath Vanga KAKINADA · 129 works | ₹6.99 Cr | 98.6% | 100.0% | ₹5,854 | 1 |
Sector is read from each work’s own description, because the portal’s category column says “Normal/Others” on almost every row.
| Sector | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roads & Paving | 1,835 | ₹119.97 Cr | 180 |
| Water | 988 | ₹33.63 Cr | 111 |
| Community Buildings | 573 | ₹71.88 Cr | 172 |
| Street Lighting | 296 | ₹17.64 Cr | 44 |
| Drainage & Sanitation | 256 | ₹14.55 Cr | 27 |
| Education | 151 | ₹19.86 Cr | 36 |
| Boundary & Protection | 148 | ₹10.25 Cr | 13 |
| Religious & Cultural | 114 | ₹7.83 Cr | 23 |
| Equipment & Vehicles | 58 | ₹4.95 Cr | 5 |
| Health | 37 | ₹7.08 Cr | 14 |
Patterns across a whole agency or member, not a judgement on any one work — which is why none of these change a work’s score.
The whole population fails the textbook test — the median agency scores 6.2 where Nigrini calls 1.5 nonconformant — because MPLADS amounts are capped, rounded and repeated by design. This ranks agencies against each other, not against the law. It is the weakest signal here and is never evidence on its own.
The whole population fails the textbook test — the median agency scores 6.2 where Nigrini calls 1.5 nonconformant — because MPLADS amounts are capped, rounded and repeated by design. This ranks agencies against each other, not against the law. It is the weakest signal here and is never evidence on its own.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
The ten works least like their peers. A score is a reason to look, never a finding of wrongdoing.
| Work | District | Agency | Sanctioned | Score | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Construction of Community hall near Sitaramaanjaneya temple, ₹5,000,000 against a ₹499,000 median for Community Buildings works in HANUMAKONDA (902% above, 29 peer works) | HANUMAKONDA | HANUMAKONDA(DISTRICT COLLECTOR HANUMAKONDA_IDA) | ₹50.00 L | 81.8 | HIGH |
| Construction Of Multi purpose Hall at Kaldhari Village,Undra ₹5,000,000 against a ₹2,500,000 median for Community Buildings works in EAST GODAVARI (100% above, 38 peer works) | EAST GODAVARI | EAST GODAVARI(DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI) | ₹50.00 L | 76.4 | HIGH |
| Construction of Community Hall in Chakirala Village of Kanig ₹2,000,000 against a ₹950,000 median for Community Buildings works in PRAKASAM (111% above, 23 peer works) | PRAKASAM | PRAKASAM(DISTRICT COLLECTOR PRAKASAM_IDA) | ₹20.00 L | 75.9 | HIGH |
| Providing drainage from G Rajsekhar house to K Hari babu hou ₹500,000 against a ₹244,126 median for Drainage & Sanitation works in ANNAMAYYA (105% above, 42 peer works) | ANNAMAYYA | Annamayya(DISTRICT COLLECTOR ANNAMAYYA_IDA) | ₹5.00 L | 73.9 | HIGH |
| Providing drainage in Peddamadigapalli H/o in D.Racchapalli ₹490,000 against a ₹244,126 median for Drainage & Sanitation works in ANNAMAYYA (101% above, 42 peer works) | ANNAMAYYA | Annamayya(DISTRICT COLLECTOR ANNAMAYYA_IDA) | ₹4.90 L | 73.9 | HIGH |
| Providing Amenities to BC Burial Ground ₹800,000 against a ₹350,000 median for Religious & Cultural works in ELURU (129% above, 16 peer works) | ELURU | Eluru(DISTRICT COLLECTOR ELURU_IDA) | ₹8.00 L | 73.9 | HIGH |
| Development of Physical infrastructure and purchase of labor ₹998,996 against a ₹498,000 median for Education works in Y.S.R. KADAPA (101% above, 21 peer works) | Y.S.R. KADAPA | Y.S.R. Kadapa(DISTRICT COLLECTOR CUDDAPAH_IDA) | ₹9.99 L | 72.2 | HIGH |
| Providing CC Drains (Reach - II) at B.C. Colony of Nallagutt ₹500,000 against a ₹244,126 median for Drainage & Sanitation works in ANNAMAYYA (105% above, 42 peer works) | ANNAMAYYA | Annamayya(DISTRICT COLLECTOR ANNAMAYYA_IDA) | ₹5.00 L | 71.4 | HIGH |
| Construction of Multipurpose Building ₹4,000,000 against a ₹500,000 median for Community Buildings works in DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA (700% above, 43 peer works) | DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA | Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema(DISTRICT COLLECTOR Dr B R AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA_IDA) | ₹40.00 L | 71.1 | HIGH |
| The renovation of old Hospital Block and Construction of new Unusual combination of sanctioned amount, delay and spending pattern — flagged by an isolation forest fitted over every work, not by any single figure being out of range | EAST GODAVARI | EAST GODAVARI(DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI) | ₹50.00 L | 71.0 | HIGH |
