Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
Ranked by how many works are waiting on verification, which is the queue a nodal authority actually has to clear. Open a district to see the agencies behind those works.
| # | District | Works | Completed | Agencies | Sanctioned | To verify | Flagged value | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SOUTH | 226 | 78 | 1 | ₹22.63 Cr | 30 | ₹6.00 Cr | 20.7 |
| 2 | CENTRAL | 105 | 28 | 1 | ₹14.45 Cr | 23 | ₹9.60 Cr | 30.8 |
| 3 | EAST | 109 | 56 | 1 | ₹11.04 Cr | 14 | ₹4.87 Cr | 30.6 |
| 4 | NORTH WEST | 89 | 24 | 1 | ₹10.02 Cr | 10 | ₹3.47 Cr | 16.2 |
| 5 | NORTH | 62 | 21 | 1 | ₹5.45 Cr | 7 | ₹1.00 Cr | 20.0 |
| 6 | SULTANPUR 1 high risk | 18 | 0 | 1 | ₹1.28 Cr | 6 | ₹70.13 L | 37.5 |
| 7 | SONIPAT | 6 | 0 | 1 | ₹66.50 L | 5 | ₹50.25 L | 50.1 |
| 8 | SOUTH WEST | 47 | 22 | 1 | ₹5.16 Cr | 2 | ₹29.68 L | 17.1 |
| 9 | SOUTH EAST | 34 | 1 | 1 | ₹4.33 Cr | 2 | ₹63.58 L | 21.0 |
| 10 | WEST | 22 | 10 | 1 | ₹3.99 Cr | 1 | ₹7.62 L | 13.4 |
| 11 | NEW DELHI | 13 | 6 | 1 | ₹88.76 L | 1 | ₹14.52 L | 25.2 |
| 12 | PATIALA | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹15.00 L | 1 | ₹15.00 L | 49.9 |
| 13 | MUZAFFARNAGAR | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹2.30 L | 1 | ₹2.30 L | 49.8 |
| 14 | NORTH EAST | 5 | 0 | 1 | ₹1.45 Cr | 0 | ₹0 | 19.1 |
| 15 | RAMPUR | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹9.97 L | 0 | ₹0 | 27.7 |
| 16 | BALLIA | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹5.07 L | 0 | ₹0 | 30.6 |
Ordered by the share of allocation actually paid to vendors, lowest first — the members whose funds are moving slowest are the ones a nodal authority chases. “Committed” is money attached to a work but not yet paid; the portal publishes that figure under the name “utilisation”, which is why the two columns differ.
| Member | Allocated | Paid out | Committed | Never committed | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Swati Maliwal Sitting Rajya Sabha · 3 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 0.0% | 7.2% | ₹13.64 Cr | 1 |
| Meenakshi Jain Nominated Rajya Sabha · 10 works | ₹7.35 Cr | 0.0% | 27.5% | ₹5.33 Cr | 5 |
| Yogender Chandolia NORTH WEST DELHI · 59 works | ₹14.79 Cr | 8.5% | 31.2% | ₹10.18 Cr | 1 |
| Kamaljeet Sehrawat WEST DELHI · 65 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 8.9% | 60.2% | ₹5.85 Cr | 2 |
| Sanjay Singh Sitting Rajya Sabha · 103 works | ₹18.45 Cr | 9.6% | 81.0% | ₹3.51 Cr | 29 |
| Manoj Tiwari NORTH EAST DELHI · 23 works | ₹22.58 Cr | 13.2% | 44.5% | ₹12.54 Cr | 7 |
| Bansuri Swaraj NEW DELHI · 110 works | ₹15.43 Cr | 14.1% | 42.4% | ₹8.88 Cr | 21 |
| Narain Dass Gupta Sitting Rajya Sabha · 51 works | ₹16.08 Cr | 15.4% | 46.9% | ₹8.54 Cr | 18 |
| Harsh Malhotra EAST DELHI · 113 works | ₹14.71 Cr | 16.6% | 52.8% | ₹6.95 Cr | 10 |
| Praveen Khandelwal CHANDINI CHOWK · 69 works | ₹14.75 Cr | 18.0% | 43.9% | ₹8.28 Cr | 7 |
| Ramvir Singh Bidhuri SOUTH DELHI · 134 works | ₹14.76 Cr | 19.6% | 87.6% | ₹1.83 Cr | 2 |
Sector is read from each work’s own description, because the portal’s category column says “Normal/Others” on almost every row.
| Sector | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sports | 253 | ₹15.83 Cr | 28 |
| Street Lighting | 236 | ₹26.80 Cr | 33 |
| Equipment & Vehicles | 122 | ₹17.59 Cr | 26 |
| Community Buildings | 36 | ₹6.28 Cr | 4 |
| Water | 25 | ₹4.38 Cr | 6 |
| Education | 17 | ₹3.68 Cr | 1 |
| Roads & Paving | 17 | ₹2.89 Cr | 3 |
| Boundary & Protection | 11 | ₹44.64 L | 0 |
| Religious & Cultural | 9 | ₹1.36 Cr | 1 |
| Drainage & Sanitation | 6 | ₹1.89 Cr | 1 |
Patterns across a whole agency or member, not a judgement on any one work — which is why none of these change a work’s score.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
The whole population fails the textbook test — the median agency scores 6.2 where Nigrini calls 1.5 nonconformant — because MPLADS amounts are capped, rounded and repeated by design. This ranks agencies against each other, not against the law. It is the weakest signal here and is never evidence on its own.
The ten works least like their peers. A score is a reason to look, never a finding of wrongdoing.
| Work | District | Agency | Sanctioned | Score | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regarding the installation of High Mast light at Sita Kund D ₹1,296,194 against a ₹563,000 median for Street Lighting works in SULTANPUR (130% above, 44 peer works) | SULTANPUR | SULTANPUR(DISTRICT MAGISTRATE SULTANPUR_IDA) | ₹12.96 L | 73.3 | HIGH |
| Construction of 400 Mtr Track in Stadium ₹1,467,000 against a ₹537,000 median for Sports works in SONIPAT (173% above, 19 peer works) | SONIPAT | SONIPAT(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SONEPAT_IDA) | ₹14.67 L | 65.3 | MEDIUM |
| Supply Installation Testing and Commissioning of cctv Survei ₹4,779,933 against a ₹318,720 median for Equipment & Vehicles works in CENTRAL (1400% above, 29 peer works) | CENTRAL | CENTRAL(COMMISSIONER MCD (CENTRAL DISTRICT)) | ₹47.80 L | 62.7 | MEDIUM |
| Supply Installation Testing and Commissioning of cctv Survei ₹25,217,575 against a ₹318,720 median for Equipment & Vehicles works in CENTRAL (7812% above, 29 peer works) | CENTRAL | CENTRAL(COMMISSIONER MCD (CENTRAL DISTRICT)) | ₹2.52 Cr | 62.7 | MEDIUM |
| Recommendation for Installation of Various Lighting Arrangem ₹3,726,112 against a ₹968,970 median for Street Lighting works in SOUTH (285% above, 119 peer works) | SOUTH | SOUTH(COMMISSIONER SOUTH) | ₹37.26 L | 62.5 | MEDIUM |
| Recommendation for Installation of Two Water Coolers at Pant ₹744,780 against a ₹372,390 median for Water works in SULTANPUR (100% above, 11 peer works) | SULTANPUR | SULTANPUR(DISTRICT MAGISTRATE SULTANPUR_IDA) | ₹7.45 L | 62.2 | MEDIUM |
| Providing or fixing of Open Air Gym Equipment ₹1,467,121 against a ₹426,472 median for Sports works in EAST (244% above, 70 peer works) | EAST | EAST(COMMISSIONER EAST) | ₹14.67 L | 61.3 | MEDIUM |
| Installation of Childrens Play Equipment ₹1,000,000 against a ₹318,720 median for Equipment & Vehicles works in CENTRAL (214% above, 29 peer works) | CENTRAL | CENTRAL(COMMISSIONER MCD (CENTRAL DISTRICT)) | ₹10.00 L | 60.6 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Basket Ball Court in Stadium ₹964,000 against a ₹537,000 median for Sports works in SONIPAT (80% above, 19 peer works) | SONIPAT | SONIPAT(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SONEPAT_IDA) | ₹9.64 L | 60.2 | MEDIUM |
| Provision of Kids Playing Equipment 299 days beyond expected completion | SOUTH | SOUTH(COMMISSIONER SOUTH) | ₹1.20 L | 55.6 | MEDIUM |