Kasauti can only be opened on a desktop or laptop.
Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
Ranked by how many works are waiting on verification, which is the queue a nodal authority actually has to clear. Open a district to see the agencies behind those works.
| # | District | Works | Completed | Agencies | Sanctioned | To verify | Flagged value | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DARBHANGA | 369 | 344 | 1 | ₹19.75 Cr | 48 | ₹4.49 Cr | 29.5 |
| 2 | PATNA | 1,389 | 1,160 | 1 | ₹90.36 Cr | 46 | ₹5.17 Cr | 18.9 |
| 3 | AURANGABAD | 251 | 225 | 1 | ₹11.51 Cr | 38 | ₹3.44 Cr | 19.1 |
| 4 | SARAN 9 high risk | 113 | 79 | 1 | ₹25.60 Cr | 32 | ₹16.02 Cr | 25.4 |
| 5 | PASHCHIM CHAMPARAN | 364 | 299 | 1 | ₹25.96 Cr | 31 | ₹3.69 Cr | 23.6 |
| 6 | SHEIKHPURA | 78 | 51 | 1 | ₹3.84 Cr | 26 | ₹1.72 Cr | 32.2 |
| 7 | KHAGARIA | 157 | 129 | 1 | ₹6.50 Cr | 20 | ₹1.50 Cr | 24.4 |
| 8 | ARWAL | 130 | 128 | 1 | ₹6.26 Cr | 16 | ₹1.50 Cr | 31.7 |
| 9 | MADHUBANI | 369 | 310 | 1 | ₹28.68 Cr | 14 | ₹1.64 Cr | 26.1 |
| 10 | NAWADA 1 high risk | 309 | 287 | 1 | ₹11.31 Cr | 14 | ₹1.08 Cr | 14.5 |
| 11 | SHEOHAR 3 high risk | 49 | 44 | 1 | ₹3.42 Cr | 11 | ₹54.84 L | 31.5 |
| 12 | NALANDA 1 high risk | 299 | 295 | 1 | ₹9.21 Cr | 10 | ₹92.07 L | 8.5 |
| 13 | SITAMARHI | 193 | 190 | 1 | ₹11.45 Cr | 9 | ₹1.18 Cr | 26.5 |
| 14 | GAYA | 233 | 227 | 1 | ₹11.65 Cr | 7 | ₹84.85 L | 15.4 |
| 15 | JEHANABAD | 95 | 85 | 1 | ₹4.12 Cr | 6 | ₹32.03 L | 18.6 |
| 16 | PURBI CHAMPARAN | 380 | 332 | 1 | ₹35.29 Cr | 5 | ₹64.50 L | 18.5 |
| 17 | MUNGER | 145 | 139 | 1 | ₹5.72 Cr | 5 | ₹20.97 L | 14.0 |
| 18 | BEGUSARAI | 76 | 71 | 1 | ₹9.19 Cr | 5 | ₹64.99 L | 12.6 |
| 19 | BUXAR | 49 | 41 | 1 | ₹4.61 Cr | 5 | ₹63.00 L | 19.9 |
| 20 | SAMASTIPUR | 339 | 330 | 1 | ₹15.23 Cr | 4 | ₹1.14 Cr | 14.1 |
| 21 | BHAGALPUR | 114 | 106 | 1 | ₹11.35 Cr | 4 | ₹44.00 L | 13.0 |
| 22 | LAKHISARAI | 102 | 90 | 1 | ₹5.97 Cr | 4 | ₹34.00 L | 13.2 |
| 23 | BHOJPUR | 99 | 91 | 1 | ₹12.54 Cr | 4 | ₹55.32 L | 21.2 |
| 24 | GOPALGANJ | 189 | 129 | 1 | ₹15.59 Cr | 3 | ₹1.13 Cr | 16.0 |
| 25 | ROHTAS | 114 | 105 | 1 | ₹7.23 Cr | 3 | ₹31.35 L | 18.4 |
| 26 | SUPAUL | 99 | 92 | 1 | ₹9.73 Cr | 3 | ₹21.70 L | 28.6 |
| 27 | ARARIA | 21 | 20 | 1 | ₹9.81 Cr | 3 | ₹1.04 Cr | 31.7 |
| 28 | KUSHINAGAR 2 high risk | 3 | 0 | 1 | ₹28.99 L | 3 | ₹28.99 L | 69.7 |
| 29 | SAHARSA | 187 | 167 | 1 | ₹15.05 Cr | 2 | ₹29.49 L | 22.0 |
| 30 | VAISHALI | 200 | 143 | 1 | ₹19.06 Cr | 1 | ₹5.30 L | 17.1 |
| 31 | JAMUI | 182 | 172 | 1 | ₹3.51 Cr | 1 | ₹5.30 L | 16.1 |
| 32 | SIWAN | 152 | 146 | 1 | ₹14.61 Cr | 1 | ₹15.00 L | 11.3 |
| 33 | MUZAFFARPUR | 149 | 136 | 1 | ₹16.85 Cr | 1 | ₹30.00 L | 11.5 |
| 34 | KATIHAR | 77 | 76 | 1 | ₹6.29 Cr | 1 | ₹5.00 L | 15.5 |
| 35 | BANKA | 69 | 66 | 1 | ₹6.06 Cr | 1 | ₹5.30 L | 12.5 |
| 36 | VARANASI | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹14.95 L | 1 | ₹14.95 L | 43.6 |
| 37 | PURNIA | 126 | 125 | 1 | ₹11.47 Cr | 0 | ₹0 | 19.8 |
| 38 | KISHANGANJ | 81 | 81 | 1 | ₹6.52 Cr | 0 | ₹0 | 22.2 |
| 39 | MADHEPURA | 71 | 49 | 1 | ₹6.51 Cr | 0 | ₹0 | 18.3 |
| 40 | KAIMUR | 46 | 45 | 1 | ₹2.94 Cr | 0 | ₹0 | 13.1 |
| 41 | HARIDWAR | 1 | 1 | 1 | ₹9.99 L | 0 | ₹0 | 28.5 |
Ordered by the share of allocation actually paid to vendors, lowest first — the members whose funds are moving slowest are the ones a nodal authority chases. “Committed” is money attached to a work but not yet paid; the portal publishes that figure under the name “utilisation”, which is why the two columns differ.
| Member | Allocated | Paid out | Committed | Never committed | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ram Nath Thakur Sitting Rajya Sabha · 33 works | ₹6.57 Cr | 0.0% | 75.4% | ₹1.62 Cr | 7 |
| Shivesh Kumar Sitting Rajya Sabha | ₹4.90 Cr | 0.0% | 0.0% | ₹4.90 Cr | 0 |
| Nitin Nabin Sitting Rajya Sabha | ₹4.90 Cr | 0.0% | 0.0% | ₹4.90 Cr | 0 |
| Upendra Kushwaha Sitting Rajya Sabha · 7 works | ₹4.90 Cr | 0.0% | 13.1% | ₹4.26 Cr | 1 |
| Sanjay Yadav Sitting Rajya Sabha · 54 works | ₹18.62 Cr | 0.0% | 43.2% | ₹10.58 Cr | 2 |
| Sanjay Kumar Jha Sitting Rajya Sabha · 6 works | ₹18.62 Cr | 2.7% | 3.4% | ₹17.99 Cr | 2 |
| Manan Kumar Mishra Sitting Rajya Sabha · 88 works | ₹23.53 Cr | 17.0% | 36.7% | ₹14.90 Cr | 2 |
| Rajiv Pratap Rudy SARAN · 46 works | ₹28.92 Cr | 27.9% | 63.8% | ₹10.47 Cr | 28 |
| Akhilesh Prasad Singh Sitting Rajya Sabha · 58 works | ₹18.62 Cr | 33.5% | 41.2% | ₹10.95 Cr | 12 |
| Manoj Kumar Jha Sitting Rajya Sabha · 176 works | ₹19.16 Cr | 45.5% | 83.9% | ₹3.08 Cr | 19 |
| Satish Chandra Dubey Sitting Rajya Sabha · 251 works | ₹23.53 Cr | 68.2% | 96.2% | ₹90.47 L | 34 |
| Rajiv Ranjan Singh MUNGER · 342 works | ₹14.30 Cr | 72.1% | 91.0% | ₹1.29 Cr | 16 |
| Dharmshila Gupta Sitting Rajya Sabha · 142 works | ₹18.62 Cr | 73.4% | 96.5% | ₹64.45 L | 20 |
| Shambhu Sharan Patel Sitting Rajya Sabha · 308 works | ₹23.72 Cr | 74.2% | 96.0% | ₹95.94 L | 39 |
| Bhim Singh Sitting Rajya Sabha · 318 works | ₹18.62 Cr | 76.9% | 94.8% | ₹97.16 L | 29 |
| Khiru Mahto Sitting Rajya Sabha · 177 works | ₹23.58 Cr | 78.0% | 78.8% | ₹4.99 Cr | 12 |
| Faiyaz Ahmad Sitting Rajya Sabha · 206 works | ₹23.53 Cr | 78.1% | 99.7% | ₹7.50 L | 9 |
| Raj Kumar Singh ARRAH · 98 works | ₹14.22 Cr | 83.3% | 87.8% | ₹1.73 Cr | 4 |
| Kaushalendra Kumar NALANDA · 288 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 84.0% | 84.6% | ₹1.51 Cr | 1 |
| Ram Kripal Yadav PATALIPUTRA · 324 works | ₹11.77 Cr | 86.3% | 86.8% | ₹1.55 Cr | 0 |
| Sushil Kumar Singh AURANGABAD · 265 works | ₹11.77 Cr | 87.0% | 91.3% | ₹1.02 Cr | 4 |
| Ravi Shankar Prasad PATNA SAHIB · 202 works | ₹11.77 Cr | 87.3% | 88.0% | ₹1.41 Cr | 3 |
| Radha Mohan Singh PURVI CHAMPARAN · 63 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 87.9% | 87.9% | ₹1.19 Cr | 2 |
| Janardan Singh Sigriwal MAHARAJGANJ · 102 works | ₹11.77 Cr | 88.7% | 92.6% | ₹86.77 L | 3 |
| Ajay Kumar Mandal BHAGALPUR · 92 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 91.8% | 96.3% | ₹36.12 L | 4 |
| Ashwini Kumar Choubey BUXAR · 68 works | ₹5.82 Cr | 92.1% | 100.0% | ₹0 | 5 |
| Vijay Kumar GAYA · 88 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 92.4% | 92.4% | ₹55.94 L | 4 |
| Sanjay Jaiswal PASCHIM CHAMPARAN · 239 works | ₹11.77 Cr | 92.6% | 94.6% | ₹63.80 L | 0 |
| Giriraj Singh BEGUSARAI · 76 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 93.1% | 93.8% | ₹61.04 L | 5 |
| Chandan Singh NAWADA · 338 works | ₹11.77 Cr | 93.6% | 98.7% | ₹14.84 L | 12 |
| Chirag Paswan JAMUI · 233 works | ₹5.95 Cr | 93.7% | 99.8% | ₹1.34 L | 10 |
| Pashupati Kumar Paras HAJIPUR · 78 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 94.7% | 94.8% | ₹38.63 L | 0 |
| Veena Devi VAISHALI · 75 works | ₹11.77 Cr | 95.7% | 95.7% | ₹50.38 L | 0 |
| Alok Kumar Suman GOPALGANJ · 104 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 95.7% | 95.7% | ₹31.92 L | 2 |
| Dulal Chandra Goswami KATIHAR · 59 works | ₹4.91 Cr | 96.1% | 97.2% | ₹13.91 L | 1 |
| Sunil Kumar VALMIKI NAGAR · 82 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 96.1% | 99.5% | ₹3.38 L | 2 |
| Mehboob Ali Kaiser KHAGARIA · 161 works | ₹4.91 Cr | 96.1% | 96.9% | ₹15.09 L | 3 |
| Ashok Kumar Yadav MADHUBANI · 84 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 96.4% | 96.4% | ₹26.43 L | 20 |
| Ajay Nishad MUZAFFARPUR · 73 works | ₹4.91 Cr | 96.6% | 96.8% | ₹15.93 L | 0 |
| Chhedi Paswan SASARAM · 85 works | ₹4.91 Cr | 96.8% | 97.2% | ₹13.70 L | 0 |
| Chandeshwar Prasad JAHANABAD · 244 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 96.9% | 97.2% | ₹27.91 L | 8 |
| Gopal Jee Thakur DARBHANGA · 273 works | ₹11.77 Cr | 97.2% | 99.5% | ₹6.09 L | 8 |
| Nityanand Rai UJJARPUR · 320 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 97.7% | 97.7% | ₹22.51 L | 0 |
| Dinesh Chandra Yadav MADHEPURA · 128 works | ₹11.46 Cr | 97.7% | 99.6% | ₹4.32 L | 2 |
| Giridhari Yadav BANKA · 85 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 97.8% | 99.3% | ₹5.26 L | 0 |
| Kavita Singh SIWAN · 109 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 98.6% | 98.6% | ₹14.07 L | 0 |
| Prince Raj SAMASTIPUR · 91 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 98.8% | 98.8% | ₹8.60 L | 1 |
| Mahabali Singh KARAKAT · 106 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 99.0% | 99.0% | ₹7.60 L | 34 |
| Santosh Kumar PURNEA · 100 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 99.2% | 99.2% | ₹7.70 L | 0 |
| Rama Devi SHEOHAR · 88 works | ₹7.36 Cr | 99.3% | 99.3% | ₹5.37 L | 5 |
| Pradeep Kumar Singh ARARIA · 20 works | ₹9.81 Cr | 99.5% | 99.5% | ₹4.96 L | 2 |
| Ramprit Mandal JHANJHARPUR · 61 works | ₹4.91 Cr | 99.6% | 99.6% | ₹2.17 L | 0 |
| Mohammad Jawed KISHANGANJ · 124 works | ₹9.64 Cr | 100.0% | 100.0% | ₹0 | 0 |
| Dileshwar Kamait SUPAUL · 48 works | ₹5.57 Cr | 100.0% | 100.0% | ₹0 | 0 |
| Sunil Kumar Pintu SITAMARHI · 184 works | ₹9.68 Cr | 100.0% | 100.0% | ₹0 | 11 |
Sector is read from each work’s own description, because the portal’s category column says “Normal/Others” on almost every row.
| Sector | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roads & Paving | 2,620 | ₹205.67 Cr | 64 |
| Street Lighting | 1,384 | ₹97.98 Cr | 101 |
| Water | 1,083 | ₹31.61 Cr | 23 |
| Education | 654 | ₹48.41 Cr | 44 |
| Community Buildings | 606 | ₹52.92 Cr | 82 |
| Religious & Cultural | 523 | ₹33.20 Cr | 31 |
| Other | 222 | ₹12.63 Cr | 22 |
| Drainage & Sanitation | 207 | ₹12.45 Cr | 12 |
| Health | 48 | ₹4.27 Cr | 1 |
| Equipment & Vehicles | 47 | ₹6.97 Cr | 2 |
Patterns across a whole agency or member, not a judgement on any one work — which is why none of these change a work’s score.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
The whole population fails the textbook test — the median agency scores 6.2 where Nigrini calls 1.5 nonconformant — because MPLADS amounts are capped, rounded and repeated by design. This ranks agencies against each other, not against the law. It is the weakest signal here and is never evidence on its own.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
The whole population fails the textbook test — the median agency scores 6.2 where Nigrini calls 1.5 nonconformant — because MPLADS amounts are capped, rounded and repeated by design. This ranks agencies against each other, not against the law. It is the weakest signal here and is never evidence on its own.
Round figures are normal and similar works legitimately cost the same. One figure covering nearly every work is what this looks for, and it means the costing is worth seeing, not that it is wrong.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
The ten works least like their peers. A score is a reason to look, never a finding of wrongdoing.
| Work | District | Agency | Sanctioned | Score | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reconstruction of Chandel Bhawan 48 feet BY 24.50 feet ₹1,499,900 against a ₹698,751 median for Community Buildings works in NAWADA (115% above, 36 peer works) | NAWADA | NAWADA(District Planning Officer NAWADA_IDA) | ₹15.00 L | 72.8 | HIGH |
| Construction work of class room of Gulaichi Devi Primary Sch ₹950,000 against a ₹400,000 median for Education works in KUSHINAGAR (138% above, 96 peer works) | KUSHINAGAR | Kushinagar(DISTRICT MAGISTRATE KUSHINAGAR PADRAUNA_IDA) | ₹9.50 L | 72.5 | HIGH |
| Construction work of class room of Shree Chhatthu prasad uch ₹950,000 against a ₹400,000 median for Education works in KUSHINAGAR (138% above, 96 peer works) | KUSHINAGAR | Kushinagar(DISTRICT MAGISTRATE KUSHINAGAR PADRAUNA_IDA) | ₹9.50 L | 72.5 | HIGH |
| Construction of Resource Room (Single Storey) 2 Nos. (Part-A ₹5,000,000 against a ₹1,427,198 median for Community Buildings works in SARAN (250% above, 51 peer works) | SARAN | SARAN(DISTRICT PLANNING OFFICE SARAN CHAPRA_IDA) | ₹50.00 L | 72.2 | HIGH |
| Construction of Resource Room (Single Storey) 2 Nos. (Part-B ₹5,000,000 against a ₹1,427,198 median for Community Buildings works in SARAN (250% above, 51 peer works) | SARAN | SARAN(DISTRICT PLANNING OFFICE SARAN CHAPRA_IDA) | ₹50.00 L | 72.2 | HIGH |
| Construction of Courtyard Shade (Part-A) at Amnour Vishwa Pr ₹5,000,000 against a ₹1,427,198 median for Community Buildings works in SARAN (250% above, 51 peer works) | SARAN | SARAN(DISTRICT PLANNING OFFICE SARAN CHAPRA_IDA) | ₹50.00 L | 71.9 | HIGH |
| Construction of Courtyard Shade (Part-B) at Amnour Vishwa Pr ₹5,000,000 against a ₹1,427,198 median for Community Buildings works in SARAN (250% above, 51 peer works) | SARAN | SARAN(DISTRICT PLANNING OFFICE SARAN CHAPRA_IDA) | ₹50.00 L | 71.9 | HIGH |
| Construction of 3 Unit Food Court (Part-A) at Amrit Sarovar, ₹4,700,000 against a ₹1,427,198 median for Community Buildings works in SARAN (229% above, 51 peer works) | SARAN | SARAN(DISTRICT PLANNING OFFICE SARAN CHAPRA_IDA) | ₹47.00 L | 71.6 | HIGH |
| Construction of 3 Unit Food Court (Part-B) at Amrit Sarovar, ₹4,692,567 against a ₹1,427,198 median for Community Buildings works in SARAN (229% above, 51 peer works) | SARAN | SARAN(DISTRICT PLANNING OFFICE SARAN CHAPRA_IDA) | ₹46.93 L | 71.6 | HIGH |
| Construction of Courtyard Shade (Part-C) at Amnour Vishwa Pr ₹5,000,000 against a ₹1,427,198 median for Community Buildings works in SARAN (250% above, 51 peer works) | SARAN | SARAN(DISTRICT PLANNING OFFICE SARAN CHAPRA_IDA) | ₹50.00 L | 71.5 | HIGH |
