Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
Ranked by how many works are waiting on verification, which is the queue a nodal authority actually has to clear. Open a district to see the agencies behind those works.
| # | District | Works | Completed | Agencies | Sanctioned | To verify | Flagged value | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CHANDIGARH | 33 | 26 | 1 | ₹5.46 Cr | 5 | ₹1.04 Cr | 23.8 |
| 2 | RUPNAGAR | 4 | 1 | 1 | ₹27.79 L | 2 | ₹20.79 L | 36.0 |
| 3 | PATIALA | 2 | 0 | 1 | ₹10.00 L | 1 | ₹5.00 L | 32.3 |
| 4 | AMRITSAR | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹10.00 L | 1 | ₹10.00 L | 59.8 |
| 5 | BATHINDA | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹10.00 L | 1 | ₹10.00 L | 49.9 |
| 6 | LUDHIANA | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹5.00 L | 1 | ₹5.00 L | 44.0 |
| 7 | BHIWANI | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹10.00 L | 1 | ₹10.00 L | 46.4 |
| 8 | FEROZEPUR | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹15.00 L | 1 | ₹15.00 L | 65.5 |
| 9 | S.A.S NAGAR | 2 | 0 | 1 | ₹10.00 L | 0 | ₹0 | 32.3 |
| 10 | YAMUNANAGAR | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹21.00 L | 0 | ₹0 | 37.1 |
| 11 | LEH LADAKH | 1 | 1 | 1 | ₹7.00 L | 0 | ₹0 | 29.3 |
| 12 | MOGA | 1 | 1 | 1 | ₹12.00 L | 0 | ₹0 | 29.8 |
| 13 | PANCHKULA | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹10.00 L | 0 | ₹0 | 27.6 |
| 14 | PULWAMA | 1 | 0 | 1 | ₹10.00 L | 0 | ₹0 | 24.3 |
Ordered by the share of allocation actually paid to vendors, lowest first — the members whose funds are moving slowest are the ones a nodal authority chases. “Committed” is money attached to a work but not yet paid; the portal publishes that figure under the name “utilisation”, which is why the two columns differ.
| Member | Allocated | Paid out | Committed | Never committed | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Satnam Singh Sandhu Nominated Rajya Sabha · 23 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 6.2% | 14.6% | ₹12.55 Cr | 8 |
| Kirron Kher CHANDIGARH · 28 works | ₹6.75 Cr | 69.8% | 78.0% | ₹1.49 Cr | 5 |
Sector is read from each work’s own description, because the portal’s category column says “Normal/Others” on almost every row.
| Sector | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equipment & Vehicles | 12 | ₹1.48 Cr | 3 |
| Education | 9 | ₹1.02 Cr | 5 |
| Sports | 8 | ₹1.07 Cr | 0 |
| Drainage & Sanitation | 6 | ₹32.37 L | 1 |
| Community Buildings | 4 | ₹30.00 L | 2 |
| Roads & Paving | 4 | ₹76.00 L | 1 |
| Water | 2 | ₹65.10 L | 1 |
| Other | 2 | ₹12.55 L | 0 |
| Street Lighting | 2 | ₹56.59 L | 0 |
| Health | 1 | ₹53.07 L | 0 |
Patterns across a whole agency or member, not a judgement on any one work — which is why none of these change a work’s score.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
Round figures are normal and similar works legitimately cost the same. One figure covering nearly every work is what this looks for, and it means the costing is worth seeing, not that it is wrong.
The ten works least like their peers. A score is a reason to look, never a finding of wrongdoing.
| Work | District | Agency | Sanctioned | Score | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drainage of Water from village to outside ₹1,500,000 against a ₹241,578 median for Water works in FEROZEPUR (521% above, 226 peer works) | FEROZEPUR | FEROZEPUR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER FIROZEPUR_IDA) | ₹15.00 L | 65.5 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Residential Building at Village Kaler (Ram T ₹1,000,000 against a ₹500,000 median for Community Buildings works in AMRITSAR (100% above, 63 peer works) | AMRITSAR | AMRITSAR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AMRITSAR_IDA) | ₹10.00 L | 59.8 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Boundary wall and Fixing of Paver Blocks ₹3,461,000 against a ₹1,000,000 median for Roads & Paving works in CHANDIGARH (246% above, 10 peer works) | CHANDIGARH | CHANDIGARH(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ZILLA PARISHAD CHANDIGARH_IDA) | ₹34.61 L | 52.2 | MEDIUM |
| Purchase of Funeral Van ₹2,141,000 against a ₹500,000 median for Equipment & Vehicles works in CHANDIGARH (328% above, 66 peer works) | CHANDIGARH | CHANDIGARH(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ZILLA PARISHAD CHANDIGARH_IDA) | ₹21.41 L | 52.2 | MEDIUM |
| Upgradation and digitization of the library through Malwa He ₹999,970 against a ₹500,000 median for Education works in BATHINDA (100% above, 16 peer works) | BATHINDA | BATHINDA(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BHATINDA_IDA) | ₹10.00 L | 49.9 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Auditorium Part 4 at Maharaj Brahmanand Bhur ₹1,100,000 against a ₹420,000 median for Education works in RUPNAGAR (162% above, 11 peer works) | RUPNAGAR | RUPNAGAR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ROOPNAGAR_IDA) | ₹11.00 L | 48.4 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Auditorium Part 2 at Maharaj Brahmanand Bhur ₹979,133 against a ₹420,000 median for Education works in RUPNAGAR (133% above, 11 peer works) | RUPNAGAR | RUPNAGAR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ROOPNAGAR_IDA) | ₹9.79 L | 48.4 | MEDIUM |
| Purchase of School Bus ₹2,500,000 against a ₹999,307 median for Education works in CHANDIGARH (150% above, 22 peer works) | CHANDIGARH | CHANDIGARH(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ZILLA PARISHAD CHANDIGARH_IDA) | ₹25.00 L | 47.2 | MEDIUM |
| Purchase of Vehicle ₹1,397,307 against a ₹500,000 median for Equipment & Vehicles works in CHANDIGARH (179% above, 66 peer works) | CHANDIGARH | CHANDIGARH(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ZILLA PARISHAD CHANDIGARH_IDA) | ₹13.97 L | 47.2 | MEDIUM |
| Establishment of Library in Panchayat Land Building through ₹1,000,000 against a ₹200,000 median for Education works in BHIWANI (400% above, 12 peer works) | BHIWANI | BHIWANI(DC Cum Nodal Officer MPLADS Bhiwani) | ₹10.00 L | 46.4 | MEDIUM |