Kasauti can only be opened on a desktop or laptop.
Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
1 works across 1 implementing agency, recommended by 1 member of parliament. No allocation figure is published per district — every rupee below is summed from the works themselves.
The people a district authority actually supervises. Vendor concentration is counted from the payment records: an agency paying almost everything to one vendor is worth a question, not an accusation.
| # | Agency | Works | Completed | Sanctioned | To verify | Avg score | Top vendor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AMRITSAR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AMRITSAR_IDA) | 1 | 0 | ₹7.00 L | 0 | 31.3 | THE CHAWINDA COOPRATIVE LABOUR AND CONSTRUCTION SOCIETY 11% of spend · 122 vendors |
Whose funds paid for this district’s works.
| Member | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Naresh Bansal Sitting Rajya Sabha | 1 | ₹7.00 L | 0 |
Sector read from each work’s description.
| Sector | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Community Buildings | 1 | ₹7.00 L | 0 |
Patterns across an agency’s whole book of work. None of these move any individual work’s score.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
Ranked by score. Cost is judged against comparable works in this district and sector, so a high cost score means unlike its neighbours — not overpriced.
| Work | Agency | Status | Sanctioned | Delay | Cost vs peers | Score | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uttaranchal ekta manch amritsar dwara nirmit Uttaranchal bha 100% similarity with another nearby work | AMRITSAR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AMRITSAR_IDA) | Recommended | ₹7.00 L | — | +40% | 31.3 | LOW |
