Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
1 works across 1 implementing agency, recommended by 1 member of parliament. No allocation figure is published per district — every rupee below is summed from the works themselves.
The people a district authority actually supervises. Vendor concentration is counted from the payment records: an agency paying almost everything to one vendor is worth a question, not an accusation.
| # | Agency | Works | Completed | Sanctioned | To verify | Avg score | Top vendor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JODHPUR(DISTRICT COLLECTOR JODHPUR IDA) | 1 | 0 | ₹20.00 L | 1 | 63.8 | KISAN TEJA RAMGADHI SIKSAN SANSTHAN KAGA JODHPUR 5% of spend · 137 vendors |
Whose funds paid for this district’s works.
| Member | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jayant Chaudhary Sitting Rajya Sabha | 1 | ₹20.00 L | 1 |
Sector read from each work’s description.
| Sector | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sports | 1 | ₹20.00 L | 1 |
Patterns across an agency’s whole book of work. None of these move any individual work’s score.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
Ranked by score. Cost is judged against comparable works in this district and sector, so a high cost score means unlike its neighbours — not overpriced.
| Work | Agency | Status | Sanctioned | Delay | Cost vs peers | Score | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Development of multi-purpose court for basketball, volleybal Unusual combination of sanctioned amount, delay and spending pattern — flagged by an isolation forest fitted over every work, not by any single figure being out of range | JODHPUR(DISTRICT COLLECTOR JODHPUR IDA) | Recommended | ₹20.00 L | 295 d | 0% | 63.8 | MEDIUM |