Kasauti can only be opened on a desktop or laptop.
Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
244 works across 1 implementing agency, recommended by 7 members of parliament. No allocation figure is published per district — every rupee below is summed from the works themselves.
The people a district authority actually supervises. Vendor concentration is counted from the payment records: an agency paying almost everything to one vendor is worth a question, not an accusation.
| # | Agency | Works | Completed | Sanctioned | To verify | Avg score | Top vendor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GURDASPUR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GURDASPUR_IDA) 1 high risk | 244 | 57 | ₹15.13 Cr | 55 | 26.1 | Brightway Contractor and Developers 25% of spend · 175 vendors |
Whose funds paid for this district’s works.
| Member | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sukhjinder Singh Randhawa GURDASPUR | 218 | ₹10.52 Cr | 48 |
| Raj Kumar Chabbewal HOSHIARPUR | 19 | ₹70.18 L | 4 |
| Harbhajan Singh Sitting Rajya Sabha | 3 | ₹31.55 L | 1 |
| Vikramjit Singh Sahney Sitting Rajya Sabha | 1 | ₹68.84 L | 1 |
| Sant Balbir Singh Sitting Rajya Sabha | 1 | ₹7.73 L | 0 |
| Amar Singh FATEHGARH SAHIB | 1 | ₹8.00 L | 0 |
| Raghav Chadha Sitting Rajya Sabha | 1 | ₹2.75 Cr | 1 |
Sector read from each work’s description.
| Sector | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roads & Paving | 80 | ₹4.22 Cr | 34 |
| Street Lighting | 45 | ₹1.80 Cr | 6 |
| Drainage & Sanitation | 41 | ₹1.63 Cr | 4 |
| Religious & Cultural | 22 | ₹1.36 Cr | 3 |
| Sports | 22 | ₹1.03 Cr | 5 |
| Community Buildings | 16 | ₹79.00 L | 1 |
| Boundary & Protection | 4 | ₹2.91 Cr | 1 |
| Equipment & Vehicles | 4 | ₹88.12 L | 1 |
| Water | 4 | ₹29.00 L | 0 |
| Education | 3 | ₹10.50 L | 0 |
Patterns across an agency’s whole book of work. None of these move any individual work’s score.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
Ranked by score. Cost is judged against comparable works in this district and sector, so a high cost score means unlike its neighbours — not overpriced.
| Work | Agency | Status | Sanctioned | Delay | Cost vs peers | Score | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Construction of Street in the Village, The working agency wi ₹1,000,000 against a ₹500,000 median for Roads & Paving works in GURDASPUR (100% above, 85 peer works) | GURDASPUR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GURDASPUR_IDA) | Recommended | ₹10.00 L | 218 d | +100% | 72.8 | HIGH |
| Park Revonation of ward no 7, The working agency will be con ₹750,000 against a ₹299,486 median for Sports works in GURDASPUR (150% above, 63 peer works) | GURDASPUR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GURDASPUR_IDA) | Recommended | ₹7.50 L | 244 d | +150% | 61.5 | MEDIUM |
| Park Revonation of ward no 27, The working agency will be co ₹750,000 against a ₹299,486 median for Sports works in GURDASPUR (150% above, 63 peer works) | GURDASPUR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GURDASPUR_IDA) | Recommended | ₹7.50 L | 244 d | +150% | 61.5 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Street in the Village, The working agency wi 218 days beyond expected completion | GURDASPUR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GURDASPUR_IDA) | Recommended | ₹7.00 L | 218 d | +40% | 57.8 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Street in the Village, The working agency wi 218 days beyond expected completion | GURDASPUR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GURDASPUR_IDA) | Recommended | ₹5.00 L | 218 d | 0% | 54.8 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Street in the Village, The working agency wi 218 days beyond expected completion | GURDASPUR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GURDASPUR_IDA) | Recommended | ₹5.00 L | 218 d | 0% | 54.8 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Street in the Village, The working agency wi 218 days beyond expected completion | GURDASPUR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GURDASPUR_IDA) | Recommended | ₹5.00 L | 218 d | 0% | 54.8 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Street in the Village, The working agency wi 218 days beyond expected completion | GURDASPUR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GURDASPUR_IDA) | Recommended | ₹5.00 L | 218 d | 0% | 54.8 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Street in the Village, The working agency wi 218 days beyond expected completion | GURDASPUR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GURDASPUR_IDA) | Recommended | ₹5.00 L | 218 d | 0% | 54.8 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Street in the Village, The working agency wi 218 days beyond expected completion | GURDASPUR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GURDASPUR_IDA) | Recommended | ₹5.00 L | 218 d | 0% | 54.8 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Street in the Village, The working agency wi 218 days beyond expected completion | GURDASPUR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GURDASPUR_IDA) | Recommended | ₹5.00 L | 218 d | 0% | 54.8 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Street in the Village, The working agency wi 218 days beyond expected completion | GURDASPUR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GURDASPUR_IDA) | Recommended | ₹5.00 L | 218 d | 0% | 54.8 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Street in the Village, The working agency wi 218 days beyond expected completion | GURDASPUR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GURDASPUR_IDA) | Recommended | ₹5.00 L | 218 d | 0% | 54.8 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Street in the Village, The working agency wi 218 days beyond expected completion | GURDASPUR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GURDASPUR_IDA) | Recommended | ₹2.00 L | 218 d | -60% | 54.7 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of Street in the Village, The working agency wi 218 days beyond expected completion | GURDASPUR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GURDASPUR_IDA) | Recommended | ₹2.00 L | 218 d | -60% | 54.7 | MEDIUM |
