Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
132 works across 1 implementing agency, recommended by 2 members of parliament. No allocation figure is published per district — every rupee below is summed from the works themselves.
The people a district authority actually supervises. Vendor concentration is counted from the payment records: an agency paying almost everything to one vendor is worth a question, not an accusation.
| # | Agency | Works | Completed | Sanctioned | To verify | Avg score | Top vendor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SAHEBGANJ(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SAHEBGANJ_IDA) | 132 | 0 | ₹2.23 Cr | 6 | 33.1 | AJIT KUMAR 70% of spend · 2 vendors |
Whose funds paid for this district’s works.
| Member | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vijay Kumar Hansdak RAJMAHAL | 130 | ₹2.13 Cr | 5 |
| Pradip Kumar Varma Sitting Rajya Sabha | 2 | ₹10.00 L | 1 |
Sector read from each work’s description.
| Sector | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water | 81 | ₹1.24 Cr | 4 |
| Roads & Paving | 38 | ₹73.50 L | 2 |
| Community Buildings | 4 | ₹8.50 L | 0 |
| Boundary & Protection | 2 | ₹3.00 L | 0 |
| Drainage & Sanitation | 2 | ₹4.00 L | 0 |
| Street Lighting | 2 | ₹5.50 L | 0 |
| Sports | 1 | ₹2.00 L | 0 |
| Education | 1 | ₹2.00 L | 0 |
| Other | 1 | ₹1.00 L | 0 |
Patterns across an agency’s whole book of work. None of these move any individual work’s score.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
Round figures are normal and similar works legitimately cost the same. One figure covering nearly every work is what this looks for, and it means the costing is worth seeing, not that it is wrong.
The whole population fails the textbook test — the median agency scores 6.2 where Nigrini calls 1.5 nonconformant — because MPLADS amounts are capped, rounded and repeated by design. This ranks agencies against each other, not against the law. It is the weakest signal here and is never evidence on its own.
Ranked by score. Cost is judged against comparable works in this district and sector, so a high cost score means unlike its neighbours — not overpriced.
| Work | Agency | Status | Sanctioned | Delay | Cost vs peers | Score | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Construction of an Overhead Water Tank for Drinking Water Su ₹600,000 against a ₹150,000 median for Water works in SAHEBGANJ (300% above, 210 peer works) | SAHEBGANJ(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SAHEBGANJ_IDA) | Recommended | ₹6.00 L | — | +300% | 59.8 | MEDIUM |
| Installation of Deep Boring at Jamabandi No.122, Plot No.363 ₹250,000 against a ₹150,000 median for Water works in SAHEBGANJ (67% above, 210 peer works) | SAHEBGANJ(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SAHEBGANJ_IDA) | Recommended | ₹2.50 L | 89 d | +67% | 43.8 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of PCC Road from balance part of the road towar 85 days beyond expected completion | SAHEBGANJ(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SAHEBGANJ_IDA) | Recommended | ₹1.00 L | 85 d | -50% | 41.7 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of PCC Road at towards the way of Kabristan (Gr 85 days beyond expected completion | SAHEBGANJ(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SAHEBGANJ_IDA) | Recommended | ₹1.50 L | 85 d | -25% | 40.9 | MEDIUM |
| Installation of Public Drinking Water boring in Village Godh 89 days beyond expected completion | SAHEBGANJ(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SAHEBGANJ_IDA) | Recommended | ₹2.00 L | 89 d | +33% | 40.1 | MEDIUM |
| Installation of Public Drinking Water boring near the house 89 days beyond expected completion | SAHEBGANJ(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SAHEBGANJ_IDA) | Recommended | ₹2.00 L | 89 d | +33% | 40.1 | MEDIUM |
| Installation of Deep Boring in Barharwa Nagar Panchayat, War 83 days beyond expected completion | SAHEBGANJ(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SAHEBGANJ_IDA) | Recommended | ₹1.50 L | 83 d | 0% | 38.2 | LOW |
| Installation of Deep Boring in Ward No.6, Daag No.222, Jamab 83 days beyond expected completion | SAHEBGANJ(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SAHEBGANJ_IDA) | Recommended | ₹1.50 L | 83 d | 0% | 38.2 | LOW |
| Installation of Hand Pump (Chapakal) near the house of Bablu 80 days beyond expected completion | SAHEBGANJ(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SAHEBGANJ_IDA) | Recommended | ₹1.50 L | 80 d | 0% | 36.6 | LOW |
| Installation of Hand Pump (Chapakal) near the house of Kaund 80 days beyond expected completion | SAHEBGANJ(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SAHEBGANJ_IDA) | Recommended | ₹1.50 L | 80 d | 0% | 36.6 | LOW |
| Installation of Hand Pump (Chapakal) in Jola Tolla, Village 80 days beyond expected completion | SAHEBGANJ(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SAHEBGANJ_IDA) | Recommended | ₹1.50 L | 80 d | 0% | 36.4 | LOW |
| Installation of Hand Pump (Chapakal) in Pradhan Tolla of Vi 80 days beyond expected completion | SAHEBGANJ(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SAHEBGANJ_IDA) | Recommended | ₹1.50 L | 80 d | 0% | 36.4 | LOW |
| Construction of Stair Ghaat (Sidhi Ghaat) in Pond of Hannan 90 days beyond expected completion | SAHEBGANJ(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SAHEBGANJ_IDA) | Recommended | ₹2.00 L | 90 d | +33% | 35.6 | LOW |
| Installation of public drinking water boring in Madarsa Taju 89 days beyond expected completion | SAHEBGANJ(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SAHEBGANJ_IDA) | Recommended | ₹2.00 L | 89 d | +33% | 35.5 | LOW |
| Installation of Public Drinking Water boring near the house 89 days beyond expected completion | SAHEBGANJ(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SAHEBGANJ_IDA) | Recommended | ₹2.00 L | 89 d | +33% | 35.5 | LOW |