Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
102 works across 1 implementing agency, recommended by 4 members of parliament. No allocation figure is published per district — every rupee below is summed from the works themselves.
The people a district authority actually supervises. Vendor concentration is counted from the payment records: an agency paying almost everything to one vendor is worth a question, not an accusation.
| # | Agency | Works | Completed | Sanctioned | To verify | Avg score | Top vendor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PALAMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER PALAMAU_IDA) | 102 | 100 | ₹3.62 Cr | 3 | 19.4 | SITA RAM PATEL 95% of spend · 2 vendors |
Whose funds paid for this district’s works.
| Member | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vishnu Dayal Ram PALAMU | 97 | ₹3.22 Cr | 1 |
| Sunil Kumar Singh CHATRA | 2 | ₹6.40 L | 0 |
| Pradip Kumar Varma Sitting Rajya Sabha | 2 | ₹28.49 L | 2 |
| Aditya Prasad Sitting Rajya Sabha | 1 | ₹5.00 L | 0 |
Sector read from each work’s description.
| Sector | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roads & Paving | 74 | ₹2.54 Cr | 1 |
| Community Buildings | 16 | ₹67.88 L | 2 |
| Drainage & Sanitation | 4 | ₹17.99 L | 0 |
| Water | 4 | ₹12.47 L | 0 |
| Religious & Cultural | 3 | ₹9.00 L | 0 |
| Education | 1 | ₹1.00 L | 0 |
Patterns across an agency’s whole book of work. None of these move any individual work’s score.
The whole population fails the textbook test — the median agency scores 6.2 where Nigrini calls 1.5 nonconformant — because MPLADS amounts are capped, rounded and repeated by design. This ranks agencies against each other, not against the law. It is the weakest signal here and is never evidence on its own.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
Round figures are normal and similar works legitimately cost the same. One figure covering nearly every work is what this looks for, and it means the costing is worth seeing, not that it is wrong.
Ranked by score. Cost is judged against comparable works in this district and sector, so a high cost score means unlike its neighbours — not overpriced.
| Work | Agency | Status | Sanctioned | Delay | Cost vs peers | Score | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Construction of community hall in Khadarpar village of Patar ₹1,449,200 against a ₹299,874 median for Community Buildings works in PALAMU (383% above, 56 peer works) | PALAMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER PALAMAU_IDA) | Recommended | ₹14.49 L | — | +383% | 60.0 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of a PCC road and Drain with Slab from the hous ₹1,400,000 against a ₹449,415 median for Roads & Paving works in PALAMU (212% above, 214 peer works) | PALAMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER PALAMAU_IDA) | Completed | ₹14.00 L | — | +212% | 60.0 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of community hall in village Purvadiha 674 days beyond expected completion | PALAMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER PALAMAU_IDA) | Recommended | ₹4.00 L | 674 d | +33% | 49.2 | MEDIUM |
| Construction of PCC road from Sukhadi Saw house towards Hanu 100% similarity with another nearby work | PALAMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER PALAMAU_IDA) | Completed | ₹5.00 L | — | +11% | 37.8 | LOW |
| Construction of 500 feet irrigation nali from Moraniya Daim ₹749,600 against a ₹400,000 median for Drainage & Sanitation works in PALAMU (87% above, 15 peer works) | PALAMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER PALAMAU_IDA) | Completed | ₹7.50 L | — | +87% | 36.9 | LOW |
| Construction of pond near Ajay Chaubey's farm in Village and ₹499,309 against a ₹299,260 median for Water works in PALAMU (67% above, 34 peer works) | PALAMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER PALAMAU_IDA) | Completed | ₹4.99 L | — | +67% | 31.7 | LOW |
| Construction of 500 feet PCC road from Rajeev Yadav house to ₹749,400 against a ₹449,415 median for Roads & Paving works in PALAMU (67% above, 214 peer works) | PALAMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER PALAMAU_IDA) | Completed | ₹7.49 L | — | +67% | 31.7 | LOW |
| Construction of 500 Feet PCC Road From Dhananjay Tiwari Hou ₹749,400 against a ₹449,415 median for Roads & Paving works in PALAMU (67% above, 214 peer works) | PALAMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER PALAMAU_IDA) | Completed | ₹7.49 L | — | +67% | 31.7 | LOW |
| Construction of Community Hall Near Panchmukhi Mandir in Bar 95% of this agency's ₹34,598,794 spend went to one vendor (SITA RAM PATEL), across 2 vendors and 201 transactions | PALAMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER PALAMAU_IDA) | Completed | ₹4.00 L | — | +33% | 23.4 | LOW |
| Construction of Community Hall near Ravidash Mandir in villa 95% of this agency's ₹34,598,794 spend went to one vendor (SITA RAM PATEL), across 2 vendors and 201 transactions | PALAMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER PALAMAU_IDA) | Completed | ₹4.00 L | — | +33% | 23.4 | LOW |
| Construction of Community hall in village Sua 95% of this agency's ₹34,598,794 spend went to one vendor (SITA RAM PATEL), across 2 vendors and 201 transactions | PALAMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER PALAMAU_IDA) | Completed | ₹4.00 L | — | +33% | 23.4 | LOW |
| Construction of Community hall in Baralota Jankpuri compound 95% of this agency's ₹34,598,794 spend went to one vendor (SITA RAM PATEL), across 2 vendors and 201 transactions | PALAMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER PALAMAU_IDA) | Completed | ₹4.00 L | — | +33% | 23.3 | LOW |
| Construction of community hall in village Latheya 95% of this agency's ₹34,598,794 spend went to one vendor (SITA RAM PATEL), across 2 vendors and 201 transactions | PALAMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER PALAMAU_IDA) | Completed | ₹4.00 L | — | +33% | 23.3 | LOW |
| Construction of community hall in village Karar kala 95% of this agency's ₹34,598,794 spend went to one vendor (SITA RAM PATEL), across 2 vendors and 201 transactions | PALAMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER PALAMAU_IDA) | Completed | ₹4.00 L | — | +33% | 23.3 | LOW |
| 16. Construction of community hall in village Kanke Khurd 95% of this agency's ₹34,598,794 spend went to one vendor (SITA RAM PATEL), across 2 vendors and 201 transactions | PALAMU(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER PALAMAU_IDA) | Completed | ₹4.00 L | — | +33% | 23.3 | LOW |