Kasauti can only be opened on a desktop or laptop.
Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
1 works across 1 implementing agency, recommended by 1 member of parliament. No allocation figure is published per district — every rupee below is summed from the works themselves.
The people a district authority actually supervises. Vendor concentration is counted from the payment records: an agency paying almost everything to one vendor is worth a question, not an accusation.
| # | Agency | Works | Completed | Sanctioned | To verify | Avg score | Top vendor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JALANDHAR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER JALANDHAR_IDA) | 1 | 0 | ₹5.00 L | 0 | 36.7 | Satnam Process Engineering 10% of spend · 197 vendors |
Whose funds paid for this district’s works.
| Member | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manish Tewari CHANDIGARH | 1 | ₹5.00 L | 0 |
Sector read from each work’s description.
| Sector | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Community Buildings | 1 | ₹5.00 L | 0 |
Patterns across an agency’s whole book of work. None of these move any individual work’s score.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
Ranked by score. Cost is judged against comparable works in this district and sector, so a high cost score means unlike its neighbours — not overpriced.
| Work | Agency | Status | Sanctioned | Delay | Cost vs peers | Score | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Provisioning for purchase of table tennis table for hall at ₹500,000 against a ₹300,000 median for Community Buildings works in JALANDHAR (67% above, 81 peer works) | JALANDHAR(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER JALANDHAR_IDA) | Recommended | ₹5.00 L | — | +67% | 36.7 | LOW |
