Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
Ranked by how many works are waiting on verification, which is the queue a nodal authority actually has to clear. Open a district to see the agencies behind those works.
| # | District | Works | Completed | Agencies | Sanctioned | To verify | Flagged value | Avg score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LOWER SIANG | 18 | 12 | 1 | ₹1.21 Cr | 2 | ₹18.00 L | 17.6 |
| 2 | EAST SIANG | 83 | 45 | 1 | ₹6.32 Cr | 0 | ₹0 | 8.4 |
| 3 | PAPUM PARE | 31 | 28 | 1 | ₹2.04 Cr | 0 | ₹0 | 9.5 |
| 4 | LOWER DIBANG VALLEY | 20 | 18 | 1 | ₹1.92 Cr | 0 | ₹0 | 8.1 |
| 5 | WEST KAMENG | 18 | 9 | 1 | ₹1.31 Cr | 0 | ₹0 | 9.5 |
| 6 | SIANG | 14 | 11 | 1 | ₹93.00 L | 0 | ₹0 | 10.1 |
| 7 | LONGDING | 13 | 9 | 1 | ₹85.00 L | 0 | ₹0 | 4.5 |
| 8 | UPPER SUBANSIRI | 13 | 13 | 1 | ₹1.01 Cr | 0 | ₹0 | 11.6 |
| 9 | NAMSAI | 12 | 9 | 1 | ₹87.96 L | 0 | ₹0 | 3.9 |
| 10 | KAMLE | 11 | 11 | 1 | ₹50.00 L | 0 | ₹0 | 3.6 |
| 11 | WEST SIANG | 10 | 10 | 1 | ₹89.00 L | 0 | ₹0 | 9.7 |
| 12 | LEPARADA | 10 | 10 | 1 | ₹39.50 L | 0 | ₹0 | 14.5 |
| 13 | LOWER SUBANSIRI | 10 | 10 | 1 | ₹81.00 L | 0 | ₹0 | 9.7 |
| 14 | EAST KAMENG | 7 | 7 | 1 | ₹65.00 L | 0 | ₹0 | 12.4 |
| 15 | LOHIT | 7 | 4 | 1 | ₹67.99 L | 0 | ₹0 | 13.3 |
| 16 | TIRAP | 6 | 4 | 1 | ₹40.00 L | 0 | ₹0 | 2.0 |
| 17 | UPPER SIANG | 4 | 1 | 1 | ₹39.00 L | 0 | ₹0 | 13.8 |
| 18 | KURUNG KUMEY | 4 | 0 | 1 | ₹52.00 L | 0 | ₹0 | 16.2 |
| 19 | ANJAW | 3 | 2 | 1 | ₹50.00 L | 0 | ₹0 | 10.1 |
| 20 | KRA DAADI | 3 | 3 | 1 | ₹30.00 L | 0 | ₹0 | 5.4 |
| 21 | TAWANG | 3 | 2 | 1 | ₹44.77 L | 0 | ₹0 | 10.3 |
| 22 | DIBANG VALLEY | 1 | 1 | 1 | ₹12.00 L | 0 | ₹0 | 13.1 |
| 23 | CHANGLANG | 1 | 1 | 1 | ₹9.98 L | 0 | ₹0 | 4.8 |
Ordered by the share of allocation actually paid to vendors, lowest first — the members whose funds are moving slowest are the ones a nodal authority chases. “Committed” is money attached to a work but not yet paid; the portal publishes that figure under the name “utilisation”, which is why the two columns differ.
| Member | Allocated | Paid out | Committed | Never committed | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tai Tagak Sitting Rajya Sabha | ₹4.90 Cr | 0.0% | 0.0% | ₹4.90 Cr | 0 |
| Kiren Rijiju ARUNACHAL WEST · 131 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 59.5% | 64.1% | ₹5.27 Cr | 0 |
| Tapir Gao ARUNACHAL EAST · 171 works | ₹14.70 Cr | 67.0% | 91.3% | ₹1.28 Cr | 2 |
Sector is read from each work’s own description, because the portal’s category column says “Normal/Others” on almost every row.
| Sector | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roads & Paving | 99 | ₹7.65 Cr | 1 |
| Boundary & Protection | 70 | ₹5.30 Cr | 0 |
| Drainage & Sanitation | 38 | ₹2.32 Cr | 0 |
| Water | 22 | ₹1.60 Cr | 0 |
| Other | 21 | ₹1.91 Cr | 0 |
| Community Buildings | 21 | ₹2.06 Cr | 1 |
| Education | 15 | ₹1.43 Cr | 0 |
| Sports | 12 | ₹68.27 L | 0 |
| Religious & Cultural | 3 | ₹20.00 L | 0 |
| Equipment & Vehicles | 1 | ₹2.00 L | 0 |
Patterns across a whole agency or member, not a judgement on any one work — which is why none of these change a work’s score.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
Not a suspicion. MPLADS funds stay spendable after a term ends, and the median MP-term leaves 16.5% uncommitted, so only well above that appears here. It is deliberately not the source's "Balance Not Yet Paid to Vendors", which is money already committed to works and merely awaiting payment.
The ten works least like their peers. A score is a reason to look, never a finding of wrongdoing.
| Work | District | Agency | Sanctioned | Score | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C/o Foot track at Hippo Village in Lower Siang District Unusual combination of sanctioned amount, delay and spending pattern — flagged by an isolation forest fitted over every work, not by any single figure being out of range | LOWER SIANG | LOWER SIANG(Deputy Commisioner Lower Siang_IDA) | ₹8.00 L | 57.1 | MEDIUM |
| Maintenance of Community Hall at Tabi Ripo in Lower Siang Di Unusual combination of sanctioned amount, delay and spending pattern — flagged by an isolation forest fitted over every work, not by any single figure being out of range | LOWER SIANG | LOWER SIANG(Deputy Commisioner Lower Siang_IDA) | ₹10.00 L | 56.6 | MEDIUM |
| C/o Medo Youth Club Office at Medo Village under Wakro Circl 362 days beyond expected completion | LOHIT | LOHIT(DEPUTY COMMISSIONER LOHIT_IDA) | ₹6.00 L | 36.5 | LOW |
| Construction of separate Toilet for Girls and Boys at Khents Completed work has no photographic documentation on record | WEST KAMENG | WEST KAMENG(Deputy Commisioner West Kameng_IDA) | ₹10.00 L | 33.0 | LOW |
| Construction of RCC Reatining wall at River Festival Ground Completed work has no photographic documentation on record | WEST KAMENG | WEST KAMENG(Deputy Commisioner West Kameng_IDA) | ₹15.00 L | 33.0 | LOW |
| Flood control work at Siju stream Soi-Koro at Kakki Village 100% similarity with another nearby work | LOWER SIANG | LOWER SIANG(Deputy Commisioner Lower Siang_IDA) | ₹10.00 L | 32.1 | LOW |
| Construction of Approach Road from PP Road to Berek agri. fi Completed work has no photographic documentation on record | SIANG | SIANG(Deputy Commisioner Siang_IDA) | ₹10.00 L | 30.4 | LOW |
| Construction of CC Step at Mane Village in Lower Siang Distr 100% similarity with another nearby work | LOWER SIANG | LOWER SIANG(Deputy Commisioner Lower Siang_IDA) | ₹5.00 L | 30.3 | LOW |
| C/o Wall near Petrol Pump, Dura- Rengging in East Siang Dist Completed work has no photographic documentation on record | EAST SIANG | EAST SIANG(Deputy Commisioner East Siang_IDA) | ₹25.00 L | 30.2 | LOW |
| C/o Culvert near WRC field at 10 mile Sille Block in East Si Completed work has no photographic documentation on record | EAST SIANG | EAST SIANG(Deputy Commisioner East Siang_IDA) | ₹20.00 L | 30.2 | LOW |