Open this link on a larger screen to see the verification queue.
1 works across 1 implementing agency, recommended by 1 member of parliament. No allocation figure is published per district — every rupee below is summed from the works themselves.
The people a district authority actually supervises. Vendor concentration is counted from the payment records: an agency paying almost everything to one vendor is worth a question, not an accusation.
| # | Agency | Works | Completed | Sanctioned | To verify | Avg score | Top vendor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ALWAR(DISTRICT COLLECTOR ALWAR_IDA) 1 high risk | 1 | 0 | ₹15.00 L | 1 | 71.5 | SHARMA CONTRACTOR 28% of spend · 193 vendors |
Whose funds paid for this district’s works.
| Member | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kapil Sibal Sitting Rajya Sabha | 1 | ₹15.00 L | 1 |
Sector read from each work’s description.
| Sector | Works | Sanctioned | To verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roads & Paving | 1 | ₹15.00 L | 1 |
Patterns across an agency’s whole book of work. None of these move any individual work’s score.
An agency whose sanctions all arrive in the last quarter looks identical. This is a spending pattern, not a finding.
Ranked by score. Cost is judged against comparable works in this district and sector, so a high cost score means unlike its neighbours — not overpriced.
| Work | Agency | Status | Sanctioned | Delay | Cost vs peers | Score | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laying of C.C. Road from NH-48 to Nathu Ram Yadav ki Dhani i ₹1,500,000 against a ₹499,897 median for Roads & Paving works in ALWAR (200% above, 187 peer works) | ALWAR(DISTRICT COLLECTOR ALWAR_IDA) | Recommended | ₹15.00 L | 610 d | +200% | 71.5 | HIGH |